A significant legal confrontation is taking place following President Donald Trump’s decision to deploy the National Guard in California without a request from Governor Gavin Newsom.
This action comes amidst widespread protests regarding the administration’s strict immigration enforcement practices in Los Angeles and other metropolitan areas, some of which have seen violent clashes between demonstrators and police.
In a public response, President Trump urged law enforcement to arrest protesting individuals, culminating in the unprecedented deployment of National Guard units, marking a rare instance of such federal action without a governor’s request.
The tense situation escalated over the weekend, with demonstrators rallying against the ongoing Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids that have reportedly led to hundreds of arrests daily, including many individuals who had previously been summoned for status hearings.
In a direct response to these protests, Trump ordered the mobilization of 2,000 National Guard personnel to Los Angeles, specifically to protect federal personnel and property amid escalating tensions and violence during protests.
Additionally, hundreds of Marines were dispatched to provide support for this mobilization, as confirmed by U.S. Northern Command.
Governor Newsom has expressed his firm opposition to this federal action, describing it as unwarranted and unprecedented.
Newsom’s press office asserted that the federal government’s decision to deploy military resources against its own citizens reflects an unacceptable level of escalation.
In a statement via his social media platform, Trump defended his deployment decision, claiming that Los Angeles would have faced severe destruction had he not intervened.
To understand the deployment of the National Guard, it’s important to distinguish between the National Guard and regular military units.
While the National Guard, despite being federally funded, operates under the authority of the states, the branches of the regular U.S. military, which include the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines, Coast Guard, and Space Force, are directly under federal control and can be mobilized at any time.
Typically, in non-wartime scenarios, it is a state’s governor who makes the decision to deploy National Guard troops, often in response to emergencies such as natural disasters.
Moreover, the Posse Comitatus Act, enacted in the 19th century, restricts federal troops from engaging in civilian law enforcement.
However, there are exceptions to this rule, particularly under the Insurrection Act, which permits the president to deploy military forces within the U.S. to maintain order during civil unrest.
Trump’s order invoked a particular clause of U.S. code, permitting federal deployment of National Guard members when a rebellion or perceived threat against the federal authority is present.
Instances of presidential deployment of the National Guard without a governor’s request have been quite rare in modern history.
According to reporting by the Associated Press, the last similar instance occurred in 1965 when President Lyndon B. Johnson deployed troops to protect civil rights marchers in Alabama, utilizing the Insurrection Act in that scenario.
In a similar vein, President George H.W. Bush deployed National Guard forces under the Insurrection Act in 1992 to help curtail riots in Los Angeles that erupted following the acquittals of those involved in the beating of Rodney King; however, in that case, the governor had requested the activation first.
The political landscape in California has shifted in response to Trump’s recent actions, with Governor Newsom not only seeking the rescission of the National Guard deployment order but also initiating a lawsuit against the Trump administration.
The administration, in turn, has escalated its response by sending approximately 700 Marines to Los Angeles to secure federal properties amid the unrest.
Looking beyond California, some have raised concerns about whether similar measures could be implemented in other states, including Illinois, particularly due to the state’s sanctuary laws, which have put it at odds with Trump’s administration in the past.
Speaking at a protest in Chicago, Rep. Jesus ‘Chuy’ Garcia indicated that he does not foresee the deployment of National Guard troops in Chicago, given the relatively peaceful nature of local protests compared to those in Los Angeles.
Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker has joined other Democratic governors in denouncing the federal deployment, stating that it undermines the ability of local authorities to manage the situation effectively without federal interference.
Pritzker is scheduled to testify before Congress this week regarding the immigration policies adopted by Illinois, which have garnered federal scrutiny but have been upheld by courts historically.
As the legal battle over Trump’s decision unfolds, the situation remains tense, with potential ramifications for how federal and state jurisdictions handle such unprecedented scenarios in the future.
image source from：https://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local/chicago-politics/amid-controversy-when-is-the-national-guard-deployed-and-who-makes-the-call/3764074/
