Chicago’s first police riot began with a simple act of defiance against a prohibitionist mayor’s crackdown on alcohol sales.
On March 13, 1855, newly elected Mayor Levi D. Boone, born in Kentucky, proposed a sweeping prohibition on the sale of alcohol in Chicago.
If that failed, he sought to increase the price of tavern licenses significantly to deter saloonkeepers.
To enforce his temperance agenda, Boone envisioned a professionalized police force made up entirely of native-born citizens.
Upon taking office, Boone quickly enforced a previously ignored 1851 law banning saloons from operating on Sundays, affecting many Irish and German immigrants.
These communities, who typically spent their only day off drinking in taverns, were painted by Boone as “drunken” and “disorderly,” a source of crime in the city.
Within a month, enforcement actions led to numerous citations against saloonkeepers, and 19 individuals found themselves in jail.
On April 21, a test case was set to be argued in court.
The courtroom was packed with German north-siders demanding the release of the incarcerated saloonkeepers, turning the event into a flashpoint.
The situation escalated when Captain Luther Nichols, leading the all-native police force, attempted to clear the courthouse square.
Ill-equipped and outnumbered, police met resistance as tensions boiled over, leading to what became known as the Lager Beer Riot.
While labeled as a riot fueled by beer, it was, in fact, a culmination of nativist, anti-Catholic sentiment prevalent in the U.S. during the 1850s.
This uprising represented years of conflict between an increasingly militant working class and a fearful business elite striving to maintain control.
Similar to modern instances of state violence, this incident illustrated how law enforcement could be wielded as a tool of political power in service of nationalist agendas.
During the decade from 1850 to 1860, Chicago experienced explosive growth, with its population nearly quadrupling from 30,000 to approximately 110,000.
Many of these newcomers were Irish and German immigrants eager to participate in an emergent wage-labor economy.
Despite this growing immigrant presence, wealthier residents viewed new arrivals with hostility, exacerbated by a burgeoning temperance movement reacting to social changes.
The Chicago Daily Tribune reflected these sentiments, condemning the drinking habits of Irish Catholics and their supposed impact on public order.
At the same time, the national conversation on chattel slavery intensified, complicating the social landscape further as debates over territories and statehood sparked political realignment.
In this context, the Know-Nothing Party formed in May 1854, appealing to those disaffected by rising immigrant populations while fusing temperance with nativist politics.
Mayor Boone, backed by this coalition, enacted his policy agenda amid growing unrest among immigrant communities.
An unsteady coalition of antislavery Democrats, temperance advocates, and nativists sought political power amidst fears of immigrant influence.
Boone’s elections reflected clandestine political maneuvers, binding various factions with a singular purpose—control over the city’s burgeoning working class.
Upon his election, Boone quickly moved to solidify his authority by expanding the police force to enforce his anti-alcohol and anti-immigrant agenda.
Historian Sam Mitrani notes Chicago lacked proper policing capabilities, as prior police forces were insufficient to manage the growing population.
In 1853, city officials created a police department, but it remained largely ineffective, necessitating Boone’s immediate reforms.
He hired 80 native-born officers, initiating a transition toward a professional police force aligned with the interests of the ruling elite.
This newly formed police unit was directed to quell protestors advocating for the release of jailed saloonkeepers, ultimately leading to violent altercations.
On April 21, as tensions mounted, exchanges of fire broke out, resulting in injuries, arrests, and a full-blown riot that necessitated martial law.
Mayor Boone’s response reflected his fear of losing control, as the rioters represented a critical mass of dissent among the ranks of immigrant workers.
In the aftermath, a public meeting held on April 23, 1855, called for an enhanced police presence to restore order in a shaken city.
Consequently, the City Council rapidly passed reform measures that birthed a more organized and militarized police force.
The April 30 ordinance signified the official formation of the Chicago Police Department, equipped with uniforms and a restructured command framework.
While New Orleans had initially pioneered a military-style police formation, Chicago modeled its department after other urban areas seeking to maintain order amidst class tensions.
The Lager Beer Riot was emblematic of the widening rift between laborers and business owners, with immigrants seizing their rights to leisure while the elite sought to impose order.
The uprising ultimately resulted in a compromise to reduce tavern license fees, albeit still far above the original sum.
While tensions subsided temporarily with the release of many arrested individuals, Boone’s regime sought to reinforce its control over the immigrant working class.
Thus, the Tribune’s historical reflection on the riot indicates that the agitation of the masses directly challenged the authority of the elite, leading to a political recalibration.
175 years later, the echoes of the Lager Beer Riot continue to resonate in contemporary struggles against systemic repression and xenophobia.
This narrative serves as a warning, emphasizing the civic responsibilities amidst growing authoritarianism and exclusionary politics.
Today, political leaders and media seeking to portray immigrants as disorderly are reminiscent of efforts made during Boone’s administration.
As history demonstrates, the response from marginalized communities can serve as a roadmap for resistance against oppressive forces.
The defiance shown by the saloonkeepers and working-class Chicagoans reverberates across time, affirming the importance of collective action in the face of systemic oppression.
Given the parallels between historical and current nativist movements, the call to respond to societal injustices remains as relevant as ever.
Understood within the context of modern political landscape, the lessons from the Lager Beer Riot compel us to confront contemporary forms of division while advocating for solidarity and justice.
image source from：https://chicagoreader.com/news/lager-beer-riot-chicago-police/
