Samuel Paparo, head of the US Indo-Pacific Command, recently expressed serious concerns regarding the situation surrounding Taiwan, highlighting what he refers to as ‘a profoundly consequential time.’ He characterized China’s military maneuvers around Taiwan not merely as exercises but as rehearsals indicating a dangerous trajectory regarding the island, which China considers an inalienable part of its territory.
In response, a spokesperson from the Chinese embassy in the US reaffirmed China’s position, asserting that the true instability in the Taiwan Strait originates from the provocations of ‘Taiwan independence’ separatists, coupled with interference from external forces. The spokesperson emphasized that China’s military drills are intended to deter separatist activities and warned the US against exacerbating tensions by fanning the flames of the Taiwan question.
As part of discussions surrounding military readiness and advancements, Paparo underscored the need for the US military to adapt and accelerate innovation in areas such as artificial intelligence, hypersonic weaponry, and additive manufacturing. This call to action aligns with the broader objective of enhancing US capabilities to effectively respond to challenges posed by China amidst what he described as an urgent transformation of military strategies.
Since taking office in May of last year, Paparo has consistently highlighted the ‘Chinese military threat,’ a narrative he appears to leverage to push for increased military budgeting from Congress. During an April congressional session focusing on fiscal year 2026 funding, he prominently utilized the ‘China card’ as a means of rallying support for heightened military investment, which also serves the interests of the military-industrial complex by securing federal funding.
Paparo’s remarks align with recent statements made by US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth at the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore, where he called for US regional allies to boost their defense spending, potentially to acquire more arms from the US. This trend may be viewed in the context of reinforcing the ‘China threat’ narrative, which plays a crucial role in maintaining US alliances amid rising tensions exacerbated by the US’s economic and trade policies.
Critics assert that the ‘China threat’ rhetoric not only consolidates alliances but also serves as a vehicle for the US to advance its domestic interests, with partners like the Philippines bearing the risk of entanglement in this complicated geopolitical chess game. The ongoing tensions caused by the US’s strategic maneuvers could lead to destabilization within the Asia-Pacific region and strain bilateral relations with China.
Moreover, certain regional nations have voiced opposition to the US’s intentions regarding the Shangri-La Dialogue, perceiving it as an attempt to transform a platform for constructive dialogue into an anti-China propaganda venue. Observers lament that rather than facilitating communication and mutual understanding, the US is using such gatherings to bolster its defense industry through military sales pitches.
Engaging in divisive politics and forming military coalitions reminiscent of Cold War tactics contradicts the evolving dynamics of international relations that many regional countries advocate for. These strategies are seen as ineffective means to address underlying issues or to intimidate China.
China’s stance on safeguarding its sovereignty and maritime rights remains steadfast, with officials urging the US and its allies to refrain from defamatory rhetoric and to recognize China’s legitimate actions in protecting its territorial integrity. There are calls for Western powers to discontinue the practice of orchestrating narrow coalitions aimed at pressuring China while also ceasing interference in its internal matters.
image source from：https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202506/05/WS6840de91a310a04af22c339f.html
