California Attorney General Rob Bonta has condemned the Trump administration’s decision to deploy around 700 Marines to Los Angeles amid ongoing protests against immigration raids. He characterized this action as an “unnecessary escalation” that further inflames tensions in a city already experiencing friction between protesters and law enforcement.
In a recent interview with NPR’s Morning Edition, Bonta emphasized that local law enforcement is already utilizing available resources effectively to address the current situation. He pointed out that protests have sometimes led to confrontations with police, road blockages, and instances of arson.
The U.S. Northern Command confirmed that an infantry battalion had been placed on “alert status” to support National Guard troops in Los Angeles. These troops are purportedly present to protect federal personnel and property in the area. Furthermore, the Pentagon announced the mobilization of an additional 2,000 National Guard members, which intensifies the military presence in the city.
“Having the Marines brought in, in addition to the National Guard, is only unfortunately inflaming the situation, creating additional tension and provocation,” Bonta stated, asserting the deployment detracts from vital National Guard responsibilities such as wildfire mitigation and drug enforcement efforts.
Bonta’s remarks came as he and California Governor Gavin Newsom filed a legal challenge against President Trump in federal court. The lawsuit alleges that the President deployed the National Guard in violation of the law and the state’s rights as protected under the 10th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
In the interview, A Martinez asked Bonta to clarify the laws that he believes President Trump is violating with the deployment. Bonta cited 10 U.S.C. 12406, the statute that the President purportedly relied on, asserting that it requires conditions of rebellion or invasion for deployment, none of which exist in the current circumstances.
Martinez pressed Bonta on whether the lawsuit would continue if the protests were to cease, suggesting that it could shift from a legal issue to a political one. To this, Bonta responded that as long as the National Guard is unlawfully present in California, the case remains valid. Even if the situation leads to political grievances, Bonta stated, “If all we have is political grievance or an ideological or policy difference, we can’t and we won’t sue.”
When discussing whether the lawsuit could be related to missing procedural paperwork by the President, Bonta clarified his stance. He made it clear that their argument isn’t simply about paperwork. He emphasized that even if the deployment had followed legal procedures, they would not have grounds for a lawsuit. However, in this case, he argued the fundamental elements needed to justify the President’s authority to deploy the National Guard are absent.
Furthermore, Martinez inquired about implications if President Trump invoked the Insurrection Act, given his reference to protesters as insurrectionists. Bonta replied that such terminology is used loosely and could be part of a broader strategy by the President to obtain additional powers during emergencies. He stressed that factual conditions would ultimately determine any legitimate exercise of authority.
Bonta firmly maintained that there is no insurrection occurring in California, dismissing Trump’s claims as excessive and unfounded.
Martinez then shifted the focus to the individuals affected by the lawsuit, including Trump supporters within California. He posed the question of why these individuals should care about the legal action being taken against the President. Bonta made a compelling argument, stating that regardless of their political affiliation, everyone deserves a leader who adheres to the rule of law and the Constitution. He asserted, “That’s our North Star,” and highlighted his commitment to holding the President accountable.
The interview concluded with Bonta addressing Trump’s recent remarks regarding potentially arresting Governor Newsom. In response, Bonta remarked that arrests can only be made in accordance with the law. He pointed out that Trump’s suggestion seemed to stem from political motivations rather than legal justification.
Bonta’s statements illustrate a broader tension between state and federal authority, particularly in light of the heavy military presence in California during a civil unrest period. His arguments resonate with calls for adherence to the Constitution and an emphasis on the rule of law, underpinning the legal actions being taken against the Trump administration.
Such ongoing developments highlight the complexity of managing public safety while respecting the rights of citizens, and they raise critical questions about the balance of state and federal powers in times of crisis.
image source from：https://www.npr.org/2025/06/10/nx-s1-5428234/marines-national-guard-los-angeles-trump-lawsuit
