Immigration and civil rights advocates in Chicago have expressed their discontent following a recent ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court which stated that individual judges lack the authority to issue nationwide injunctions. This decision has raised uncertainties surrounding birthright citizenship, a crucial aspect of American law that ensures citizenship for anyone born on U.S. soil, irrespective of their parents’ immigration status.
The ruling is seen as a significant victory for President Donald Trump, who has often criticized individual judges for obstructing his policies. However, the conservative majority on the high court has left the door open for potential nationwide blocks against proposed changes to birthright citizenship.
According to Trump’s directives, citizenship would be denied to U.S.-born children of parents who are residing in the country without legal status. This proposed change directly challenges the 14th Amendment of the Constitution, which has guaranteed birthright citizenship since the aftermath of the Civil War.
The landmark case of United States v. Wong Kim Ark in 1898 established that only certain categories of individuals, such as diplomats, individuals born on foreign vessels, and those born to enemy occupiers, are excluded from automatic citizenship upon birth in the U.S. The current legal framework has thus been predominantly supportive of birthright citizenship, including children born to undocumented immigrant parents.
Ed Yohnka, a representative from the ACLU of Illinois, characterized the Supreme Court’s decision as cruel and damaging, emphasizing its potential to create a patchwork of citizenship laws across the country. Yohnka remarked, “Your fundamental rights, under the U.S. Constitution, should not depend on whether or not there is an advocate who can bring a lawsuit in Massachusetts versus bringing a lawsuit in Louisiana versus bringing a lawsuit in Idaho or Illinois.”
The implications of the ruling are profound for families with mixed immigration statuses. Tovia Siegel from the Resurrection Project noted the anxiety many immigrant parents face regarding their children’s future. She stated, “I hear it over and over again — that if they send me back, what will happen to my children?”
The precarious situation becomes even more alarming, particularly for children of Venezuelan immigrants. Ana Gil Garcia from the Illinois Venezuelan Alliance highlighted the difficulty these children may face if they are denied American citizenship, leaving them potentially stateless. “That’s a defenseless child who won’t have the possibility of a secure future, without options to access education, to health care and other benefits that come with birthright citizenship from this country,” she explained.
Currently, the U.S. ranks among approximately 30 nations that uphold the principle of jus soli, or birthright citizenship, which allows for automatic citizenship based on birthplace. Neighboring countries like Canada and Mexico also recognize this principle.
The Trump administration’s position asserts that children born to noncitizens are not “subject to the jurisdiction” of the U.S., a critical interpretation that challenges longstanding legal norms about birthright citizenship established by the 14th Amendment.
Legal actions initiated by various states, immigrants, and civil rights groups have sought to block the executive order, arguing it undermines foundational understandings of citizenship rights that have been accepted throughout American history. Illinois Attorney General Kwame Raoul has stated the state will persist in its opposition to Trump’s executive order. “Even after today’s decision, birthright citizenship — a rule that has governed our country since the end of the Civil War — remains the law in Illinois,” Raoul asserted.
In the wake of the ruling, Nicole Hallett, a law professor at the University of Chicago, advised immigrant parents in Illinois to secure U.S. passports and social security numbers for their children promptly. This step would help document their citizenship entitlements while the legal challenges to Trump’s order progress through the lower courts.
Hallett also pointed out that Illinois could become a sanctuary for those seeking recognition of citizenship for their children, given that it was among the states that filed suit against Trump’s policy. She explained, “You don’t have to be born in Illinois, you just have to be a resident in Illinois.”
With the Supreme Court’s recent decision making it more challenging to obtain nationwide injunctions, advocates anticipate needing to adopt a more strategic approach to legal challenges. Yohnka noted the ACLU had successfully obtained injunction relief in about half of the cases it challenged during Trump’s early presidency. The organization will now need to consider duplicative legal actions in various jurisdictions to combat Trump’s executive order effectively.
As the 30-day window before the enforcement of the policy approaches, attorneys and advocates are rallying to prevent any implementation of the executive order on birthright citizenship. The Illinois Coalition for Immigrant and Refugee Rights has voiced support for ongoing legal challenges against the order, as the future of many children born in the U.S. hangs in the balance.
image source from：wbez
