The Chicago Housing Authority (CHA), the third largest public housing authority in the United States, is in a state of turmoil as it looks to appoint a new CEO.
With a recent $24 million lawsuit judgment over lead paint poisoning, dissatisfaction among residents, high executive turnover, and looming cuts to HUD, the new leader will face a significant set of challenges.
Mayor Brandon Johnson, who has prioritized housing in his administration, must decide on a successor to former CEO Tracey Scott, who left her position in November.
Residents, alongside housing advocates such as Francine Washington, a CHA board member, have expressed their desire for a leader who is more engaged with them and willing to rebuild trust.
The agency, according to its statement, is undergoing a “bold shift toward renewal grounded in equity, accountability, and dignity for all residents.”
Historically, Chicago mayors wield considerable power over the CHA, including the ability to appoint board members and influence CEO selections.
It remains uncertain how involved Mayor Johnson has been in this search process, as he has had challenges managing other city departments, including the Chicago Public Schools and the Chicago Transit Authority.
Scott’s term was marred by controversy, notably regarding her decision to lease land for the Chicago Fire Football Club’s training facility, a move that faced public outcry and legal hurdles.
Johnson has indicated a commitment to preventing the transfer of CHA land for non-housing purposes, emphasizing that public land should not be sold off to the highest bidder or political allies.
The CHA has not fulfilled many of its commitments from the “Plan for Transformation” launched in 2000 to redevelop public housing for the city’s residents.
Ald. Jeanette Taylor, who personally endured a 30-year wait for a CHA housing voucher, believes significant personnel changes are necessary for the agency.
In a time of financial strain and high interest rates, Burnett and Taylor advocate for leveraging public funds to expedite housing construction on vacant CHA land.
The CHA faced a major setback in early January when a jury ruled that it must pay over $24 million to two residents due to lead paint poisoning allegations.
Although the CHA managed properties through firms that were ultimately found not liable, ongoing legal disputes continue to plague the agency.
Additionally, the departure of eight high-ranking CHA officials since last summer has raised concerns about internal stability and morale within the agency.
Executive turnover has resulted in significant operational shifts, leading current employees to express feelings of uncertainty and frustration.
An anonymous senior staff member suggested that the new CEO should prioritize connecting with residents and addressing longstanding issues regarding favoritism in the workplace.
There has been an ongoing conflict between the CHA and a resident leader over promises to renovate Brooks Homes, highlighting tensions between the agency and residents.
In response to previous criticisms, CHA announced it would introduce several initiatives aimed at enhancing transparency and engagement with residents.
Efforts include a resident survey to gather feedback on housing conditions and services, as well as a new division focused on addressing environmental hazards such as lead paint.
Despite these developments, some staff members regard the morale at the CHA as low, citing a disconnection between agency leadership and employees.
An anonymous email sent to the CHA board from several employees echoed discontent with the organizational culture and requested necessary reforms.
While the CHA publicly claims commitment to its mission of providing stability and dignity to over 135,000 residents across Chicago, the agency acknowledges it is undergoing a period of significant transition.
The ceaseless turnover has affected the agency’s effectiveness at a critical time when residents are seeking improvements in housing safety and services.
CHA has constituted a “diverse and inclusive” search committee for the new CEO, though it has faced scrutiny for the limited resident representation amid its decision-making process.
Currently, only one resident, board member Francine Washington, serves on this committee, raising questions about the agency’s commitment to authentic engagement with the community.
The CHA recently announced that 107 candidates applied for the CEO position, but further information regarding the candidates has not been disclosed.
Eugene Jones Jr., who previously served as CEO, remains a candidate for the role, although his prior tenure evoked mixed feelings among stakeholders.
According to resident advocates, while Jones had a strong rapport with some, there are calls for new leadership to address unmet housing needs more effectively.
Appointing a new CEO offers a chance for the CHA to improve relations with its residents and overcome recent controversies that have tarnished its reputation.
The upcoming leadership decision will be a pivotal moment for the CHA, as its effectiveness directly impacts the lives of thousands in a city grappling with housing affordability and environmental safety issues.
In light of these ongoing challenges, residents and advocates alike hope for a leader who will establish genuine connections rather than adhere to a top-down approach.
Cheryl Johnson, a long-term resident of CHA properties, offered insightful advice for the incoming CEO, emphasizing a collaborative approach to leadership.
“Don’t come in as a dictator. Come with an open mind and think outside the box and listen to the concerns of the residents,” she stated, reminding future leaders to engage rigorously with the community to ensure meaningful change.
The future of the CHA hinges on the decisions made in the coming weeks as it seeks a leader capable of navigating its complex landscape while addressing the urgent housing needs of Chicagoans.
image source from：chicagotribune
