Boulder County’s struggle to fund early childhood programs like the Head Start preschool program has become emblematic of a broader issue facing local governments across Colorado.
In a recent rejection of federal funding, Boulder County was denied its annual request, heightening concerns about sustaining essential services.
As the Trump administration signaled potential reductions in federal support for programs like Head Start, local officials found themselves at a crossroads, desperately seeking solutions.
In a proactive move, the Boulder County Commission allocated $2 million in stop-gap funding to keep Head Start operating for at least another year, but worries persist about how to sustain the program without further federal assistance.
Commissioner Ashley Stolzmann emphasized the impossibility of expecting local governments to cover the financial shortfalls left by state and federal budget cuts.
“We can’t just expect local governments to be able to pay for all the services that the state and federal government were paying for,” Stolzmann told The Colorado Sun in a recent interview.
The economic landscape is particularly difficult as state budget cuts are projected to cost local governments nearly $140 million, as reported by Kevin Bommer, executive director of the Colorado Municipal League.
This scenario, described by Bommer as a recurring theme in Colorado’s economic management, echoes experiences from the 2010s when local governments were often turned to for financial solutions during state budget crises.
“I’ve seen it before,” Bommer said. “It doesn’t matter if it’s a recession, it doesn’t matter if it’s times of prosperity. When the state needs money to backfill the budget, they will drain funds that local governments use for prosperity in their own cities and towns and counties.”
The proposed state spending plan for the 2025-26 fiscal year signals a shift in priorities, diverting millions in severance and marijuana tax revenues away from local governments.
This plan also cuts vital funding for infrastructure projects, including road maintenance and besides eliminating a popular grant program aimed at revitalizing downtowns.
As federal budget discussions loom, the potential for deeper cuts raises alarms among local officials managing programs that provide crucial assistance to low-income families.
“The need is going up at the same time that we’re cutting services,” Stolzmann noted, highlighting the alarming rise in homelessness and joblessness due to budget constraints.
In response to these pressures, some local governments are contemplating tax increases, with over a dozen officials supporting a recent bill that would enable counties to raise lodging taxes with voter approval.
This bill, known as House Bill 1247, recently passed the state legislature and is awaiting the governor’s signature. It would not only raise the cap on lodging taxes but also expand the scope for spending those funds on pressing local services.
Summit County commissioners expressed concerns about the potential delays in critical infrastructure repairs due to budget shortages, citing Swan Mountain Road repairs as paramount for the local community.
Many local governments are already anticipating budget shortfalls in the upcoming year, even before understanding the full implications of state and federal cuts.
The current political climate reflects a notable shift in attitudes towards local government funding, especially given the previous era when local entities had a more significant voice in budget discussions.
This year’s legislative session has demonstrated an increasingly distant relationship between state lawmakers and local governments, with the lack of dialogue raising concerns.
Bommer remarked on the absence of any discussion regarding the impacts of state budget cuts on local governments, reflecting a broader change in the approach to local funding.
While local governments had previously enjoyed more direct negotiations with the state over budgetary concerns, the current cuts seem to indicate a dismissal of local needs.
State lawmakers’ disillusionment with reimbursing local entities for property tax cuts is evident, as many legislators now perceive the increase in property tax revenues not as a windfall but as an undeserved liability for the state.
Most local governments operate outside the restrictions of the Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights (TABOR), allowing them to retain excess revenue without having to issue taxpayer refunds.
The failure of Proposition HH regarding property tax cuts at the ballot in 2023 has contributed to local officials’ frustrations, as state lawmakers become less inclined to support local agencies.
As the state grapples with a significant budget shortfall of $1.2 billion, the Joint Budget Committee is also seeking to alleviate pressure by shifting more responsibilities away from the state and onto local governments.
Republican Sen. Barbara Kirkmeyer, a member of the Joint Budget Committee, articulated the need to reassess the division of responsibilities, suggesting local governments consider their roles more independently.
Meanwhile, local agencies face their own set of financial difficulties, with property values showing slower growth, and commercial properties potentially entering a downturn, compounding the challenges ahead.
In rural areas experiencing stagnant growth, the increase in property taxes has not been a boon but rather a struggle to regain footing after years of austerity post the Great Recession.
As recession warnings proliferate amidst ongoing state and federal cuts, local governments are confronted with the dual challenge of decreasing resources while the demand for critical safety net programs continues to grow.
In the face of economic uncertainty and political changes, local officials express their need for direct communication and acknowledgment of the struggles their communities endure, which are often overlooked in state and federal budget strategies.
image source from：https://coloradosun.com/2025/04/22/how-state-federal-budget-cuts-affect-local-governments-colorado/
