The Atlantic Council GeoEconomics Center’s recent visit to London coincided with significant geoeconomic developments for both the United Kingdom (UK) and the global landscape.
The Center’s team aimed to evaluate whether the recent trade agreement between the United States and the UK could serve as a model for other nations aspiring to form trade accords with the US.
In the wake of the Trump administration’s entrenched Liberation Day tariffs, British officials initially perceived the prospect of negotiating with the United States as a perilous undertaking, fearing backlash from other nations.
However, so far, no country appears to hold the UK responsible for enabling the US’s 10 percent tariff, which is increasingly regarded as a standard expectation for allied states.
British representatives acknowledged the complexities surrounding tariffs, aligning with the GeoEconomics Center’s perspective that the Trump administration remains committed to tariff strategies more than the markets anticipated.
The UK’s exemption from certain section 232 tariffs on autos and steel, albeit limited to specific quotas, has been celebrated as a significant win in UK-US relations.
Although concessions on various imports, such as beef and ethanol, have begun to draw some political critique, the backlash has been minimal so far.
During discussions, UK officials expressed surprise at the potential for the reciprocal tariffs recently announced to be reinstated on other markets should bilateral negotiations not align with the president’s expectations.
This insight enhanced their sense of security regarding the deal, while illuminating the misinterpretations of the US’s trade ambitions that even allied governments possess.
The agreement’s succinct four paragraphs addressing economic security reveal that the UK government is aware of US concerns related to avoiding tariffs through transshipping practices.
An understanding was established to avoid further discussions on transshipments and high-risk vendors, though officials were quick to assert that this does not impede London’s efforts to reset its relations with China.
Charles Lichfield, deputy director of the GeoEconomics Center, highlighted this point in his testimony before the International Relations and Defence Committee of the UK House of Lords regarding the future of the UK-US relationship.
The Labour government’s scheduling of trade agreements exhibits a careful calibration of domestic political factors.
The timeline of both the US deal and the recent trade agreement with India was strategically planned to precede the UK-EU Summit, which aimed to promote renewed cooperation.
This positioning enables the Labour government to assert it is fulfilling global trade objectives that the Conservative Party had promised but failed to realize post-Brexit.
Every trade deal possesses inherent political risks.
Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s government faced criticism for permitting companies to employ Indian tech talent without adhering to British labor standards.
Nevertheless, by prioritizing US and Indian trade deals, the Labour government seemingly mitigated accusations of a “Brexit betrayal.”
The initiative to enhance relations with the EU has also gained public favor.
It is noteworthy that the British fishing sector, contributing minimally to the economy, garners disproportionately high attention, while the domestic beef industry now faces intensified competition from US imports, receiving far less scrutiny.
Despite securing trade agreements, the Labour government’s poll numbers have plummeted due to sluggish growth, projected at just over one percent this year, alongside contentious migration discussions.
Without noticeable enhancements to public finances, Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves has had to adjust strategy from limiting spending and placing blame on the prior Conservative government to focusing now on promoting economic growth.
Recently, Prime Minister Starmer modified one of Chancellor Reeves’ principal policies regarding “means testing,” an entitlement program aiding pensioners with winter heating costs, by raising the undisclosed cutoff threshold for assistance.
This decision leaves the government exposed to criticism from its own parliamentary group, which is likely to demand further concessions for social spending to stimulate an expedited sense of economic improvement.
The Trump administration’s expectations for its oldest allies stand in stark contrast to its approach to newer partners in the Gulf.
During a speech at Chatham House, Josh Lipsky emphasized that the economic security aspect of the UK-US trade deal could serve as a cornerstone for a future Group of Seven collaboration aimed at countering China’s economic influence.
However, UK officials raised two pivotal concerns during discussions.
The first focused on uncertainty surrounding whether the United States values alliances for achieving economic objectives or if it prefers a reset of global trade dynamics independent of cooperative relationships.
The second concern revolved around the precariousness of policies formulated under the current US administration, with no assurance that they would endure beyond its term.
Similar inquiries were made at the Bank of England, where senior officials questioned the administration’s stances on stablecoins and cryptocurrency.
Their analysis raised alarms about the potential destabilization of international financial systems if these assets are unleashed globally without appropriate regulatory measures.
The overarching sentiment among UK officials was a desire for stability, tempered by a reluctant recognition that such stability seems unlikely to arise from the US in the immediate future.
As the Labour government nears its first anniversary in power, it is skillfully navigating an intricate web of international relations.
In addition to trade agreements, the government has maintained a level of engagement with the Trump administration regarding the ongoing situation in Ukraine.
These accomplishments further the narrative of domestic economic prosperity in the UK, yet enabling voters to perceive tangible benefits from these initiatives remains a formidable challenge.
image source from：https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/econographics/dispatch-from-london-engaging-trump-without-alienating-the-rest/
