Recent accusations from the United States administration against China regarding the compliance with the Geneva agreement have sparked a heated debate, with critics labeling the U.S. claims as disingenuous.
U.S. President Donald Trump, in a recent post on his Truth Social platform, asserted that China was ‘totally violating the agreement.’ However, he did not specify how China was reportedly failing to adhere to the terms reached in Geneva.
Similarly, U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick suggested in an interview with Fox News that China was ‘slow-rolling’ the agreement. These claims come amidst a backdrop where China has reportedly complied fully with the terms to reduce high tariffs on U.S. goods for a designated 90-day period following the Geneva talks.
In response to the joint statement released on May 12, China has taken steps to cancel or suspend relevant tariff and non-tariff measures that targeted the U.S.’s ‘reciprocal tariffs.’ This action aligns with the consensus achieved between both nations during the recent talks.
It appears that a correspondence from the Alliance for Automotive Innovation (AAI) to the White House may have influenced the U.S. administration’s decision to accuse China of non-compliance. The AAI expressed frustration regarding what it views as delays by China in approving export licenses for rare earth elements and other materials crucial for the automotive industry, particularly electric vehicles and semiconductor chips.
As a result, U.S. officials have initiated a blame game, with Trump’s deputy chief of staff, Stephen Miller, stating that China’s perceived failure to meet its obligations ‘opens up all manner of action for the United States to ensure future compliance.’
The U.S. Department of Commerce confirmed its review of exports deemed strategically significant to China, indicating the possibility of suspending current export licenses or imposing additional requirements while evaluations are ongoing.
In contrast, the Chinese Ministry of Commerce retaliated with a statement emphasizing that it is the U.S. that has enacted a series of restrictive measures against China post-Geneva talks. These measures include export controls on artificial intelligence chips, imposed curbs on chip design software sales, and a crackdown on visa issuance for Chinese students in the U.S.
A spokesperson for the Chinese Foreign Ministry reaffirmed China’s commitment to stabilizing global industry and supply chains. The spokesperson reiterated China’s readiness to enhance dialogue and cooperation regarding export controls with other nations and regions.
The narrative suggests that it is the U.S. that has undermined the goodwill and consensus forged during the Geneva meeting, catalyzing new economic and trade frictions. This has exacerbated uncertainty and instability within the bilateral economic and trade relationship.
Other global economies must recognize attempts by the U.S. to manipulate agreements into one-sided obligations that impose constraints on China while conveniently ignoring its own commitments.
Instead of capitalizing on the constructive momentum fostered by the Geneva discussions, the U.S. administration appears to leverage the agreement to create a zero-sum scenario.
Despite these challenges, China has pledged to uphold its responsibilities outlined in the agreement while also safeguarding its rights and interests against U.S. coercion.
The Joint Statement on the China-U.S. Economic and Trade Meeting, forged through mutual respect and equal consultation, represents essential consensus that should be valued.
In light of this, the U.S. must shift its approach from exploitation of the agreement toward genuine cooperation with China aimed at building upon the achievements from the Geneva meeting to foster healthy, stable, and sustainable economic and trade relations.
image source from:https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202506/02/WS683d9bb2a310a04af22c2c43.html