Amid heightened efforts by President Donald Trump and congressional Republicans to impose proof of citizenship for voter registration, the journey from aspiration to implementation has faced significant hurdles.
Trump’s executive order for a documentary proof-of-citizenship mandate has been met with legal challenges, while federal efforts have struggled to secure the necessary votes for passage in the Senate.
On a state level, the situation mirrors these challenges, as legislative attempts in GOP-controlled areas have largely faltered.
In Texas, the recent legislative session ended without approval for a monumental Senate bill that aimed to enforce proof of citizenship not just for new voters but also for the approximately 18.6 million already registered.
Voting rights advocates, including Anthony Gutierrez of Common Cause Texas, criticize the bill’s authors for their failure to clarify how such a significant change would be feasible, especially without placing undue burdens on voters.
It is crucial to note that voting by noncitizens is illegal and carries severe consequences, including potential deportation.
Nevertheless, Trump and his supporters continue to advocate for proof-of-citizenship laws, suggesting that they would enhance public confidence in electoral integrity.
Despite his claims before the 2020 election, evidence shows that instances of noncitizen voting are extremely rare, generally occurring more as an error than an intentional act.
Advocacy groups warn that requiring proof of citizenship could disenfranchise millions of citizens, particularly those who may struggle to access documentation like birth certificates or passports.
This concern escalates for married women who have changed their surnames, potentially leaving them without matching identification.
The issue is gaining traction; the number of states considering proof-of-citizenship bills surged this year, although tangible results remain elusive.
Only Wyoming has enacted legislation along these lines, while states such as Florida, Missouri, Texas, and Utah have watched similar proposals stall or collapse.
In Ohio, a potential bill is still in discussion, although Governor Mike DeWine has expressed reluctance to support additional voting restrictions.
In Texas, the proposed proof-of-citizenship legislation initially advanced swiftly through the Senate but was unable to secure a vote in the House before adjournment.
This left many puzzled, particularly as every Senate Republican co-authored the bill.
Democratic Representative John Bucy, who serves as vice-chair on the House elections committee, remarked that the perceived failures seen in other states likely dissuaded Texas lawmakers from pursuing such policies.
He highlighted the specific vulnerability of married women who have changed their last names, drawing parallels to difficulties encountered in similar legislative efforts in states like New Hampshire.
Previous experiences in various states that sought to institute proof-of-citizenship laws have encountered significant confusion and legal battles post-implementation.
For instance, an audit in Arizona revealed that data handling problems impeded the verification process for residents’ citizenship, leading to the identification of 200,000 voters who were believed to have met the proof requirements but failed to do so.
Kansas previously functioned with proof-of-citizenship laws for three years, only to have them nullified by federal courts, with studies indicating that nearly all the 30,000 individuals denied voting rights during that time were eligible citizens.
In Missouri, a proposed proof-of-citizenship bill passed a Senate committee but collapsed without a vote in the full chamber.
Ben Brown, the state senator who championed the measure, cited his prioritization of other election-related legislation alongside factors like limited session time as reasons for the bill’s non-advancement.
He noted the necessity to consider feedback from local election officials and stated intentions to reintroduce proof-of-citizenship legislation next year.
Similar complications have compelled several states to shift focus onto different legislative matters.
In Utah, legislators emphasized other election changes, including new voter ID measures and revisions to mail-in voting procedures, prior to the signing of new law by Governor Spencer Cox.
Under the Florida bill that struggled to move forward, voter registration applications would only receive validity after confirming citizenship through previous voting history or other verification processes.
The logistical guidelines prescribed meant that voters would also need to demonstrate their citizenship status when altering their address or political affiliation.
Republican state representative Jenna Persons-Mulicka, who sponsored Florida’s proposed bill, claimed it was a direct response to Trump’s executive order, encapsulating his call for a more stringent verification process for voters.
Ultimately, without overcoming procedural and public sentiment obstacles, the push for citizenship verification in voting will continue to face substantial roadblocks, reflecting a complex intersection of legality, public perception, and political will.
image source from：https://apnews.com/article/trump-republicans-citizenship-voting-elections-texas-b6b9298092c84266bc7515209e5aea42
