In Anchorage, the head of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) addressed concerns regarding several canceled grants in Alaska, worth tens of millions of dollars, particularly those aimed at renewable energy projects.
The grants supported various initiatives, including wind, solar, and battery systems designed to lower utility costs and generate jobs and income for tribal governments aiming to become independent power producers.
Lee Zeldin, the EPA administrator, remarked that, despite challenges, many issues found in Alaska’s grants are “fixable.”
He highlighted that while some cancellations were due to significant flaws, other projects had minor issues that could be resolved.
Zeldin emphasized the agency’s commitment to addressing these matters in collaboration with Alaska’s congressional delegation.
“Our goal is to ensure that when we go before Congress, we can explain our commitment to upholding a zero-tolerance policy regarding waste and abuse of taxpayer dollars,” he stated during a news conference at the Alaska Sustainable Energy Conference.
This recent development follows an earlier directive from President Donald Trump, who ordered a pause on spending related to significant funding acts—the $1.2 trillion bipartisan infrastructure act and the $900 billion Inflation Reduction Act, both of which included substantial allocations for renewable energy initiatives in Alaska.
The EPA has faced legal pushback as critics argue that these freezes infringe upon congressional authority over budgetary matters.
While Zeldin did not elaborate on the specific problems affecting the Alaska grants or the scope of their cancellations, he suggested that new grants reflecting similar objectives might still be approved, possibly at reduced funding levels.
Joining Zeldin in Alaska was a contingent of top Cabinet officials aiming to hear from local leaders as they pursue Trump’s ambitions to expand oil, gas, mineral, and timber development in the state.
Their visit coincided with a rally for work crews at the trans-Alaska pipeline and the announcement of new drilling plans in the 23-million-acre National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska.
However, the administration’s presence was met with protests, including more than 50 demonstrators outside the energy conference.
Protesters criticized the pro-oil agenda, advocating for renewable energy solutions instead.
Particularly alarming was the cancellation of nearly 800 grants by the EPA earlier this year, a decision that directly impacted at least two substantial grants totaling $20 million each in Alaska.
One of these grants was intended for expanding a wind farm that would have significantly increased renewable power use in Kotzebue, while the other focused on solar arrays and battery installations in five villages within the Nome region.
Community leaders expressed disappointment that the projects could have mitigated high water and sewer bills while cutting down on the reliance on expensive diesel fuel for electricity generation.
Chad Nordlum, energy project manager for the Native Village of Kotzebue, lamented the cancellation, stating it was disheartening after more than two years of preparation.
“This definitely sets the tribe back in our plans for renewable energy, and not just the tribe, but our whole community,” Nordlum explained.
He noted that the cancellation could spell economic fallout as the grant was aimed at creating a stable source of income for the tribe.
The notification of cancellation, which Nordlum claims lacked specific reasoning, reflected the EPA’s perspective that the projects did not align with the agency’s funding priorities for achieving program goals.
“This seems to have been a mass termination rather than an individualized review,” he commented, indicating a procedure that may not have adequately considered each project’s merit.
In light of Zeldin’s comments, there remains a glimmer of hope for reinstatement of the grants, he added.
Meanwhile, Amanda Toerdal, project manager for Kawerak, an Alaska Native nonprofit, expressed similar disappointment regarding the impact of the cancellations on villages in the Bering Strait region, which had anticipated the initiation of solar energy projects.
“This was met with hope and excitement. The independence that these projects promised would have elevated these communities greatly,” Toerdal said.
Kawerak had aimed to create workforce development opportunities, establishing maintenance jobs within the villages.
Despite facing setbacks, she expressed a desire to find constructive solutions and not to assign blame.
Additionally, Katya Karankevich of the Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium highlighted the economic factors that render renewable energy an efficient alternative for rural Alaskan communities.
Given the logistical challenges of transporting diesel and gas to over 200 villages, she emphasized that renewable energy projects represent the most economical new energy options available without a natural gas pipeline.
Karankevich acknowledged the shifting priorities with each new administration and noted that many projects in Alaska still align with the current executive objectives.
As the situation unfolds, stakeholders are hopeful that dialogue between federal officials and Alaskan leaders can not only clarify the cancellations but potentially lead to the revival or approval of viable renewable energy initiatives in the state.
image source from：https://www.adn.com/business-economy/energy/2025/06/04/as-communities-grapple-with-canceled-grants-us-epa-leader-says-halted-projects-in-alaska-have-fixable-issues/
