Saturday

06-21-2025 Vol 1998

Crunching Numbers: The Impact of Proposed Cuts to Social Safety Nets in Colorado

As families in Denver and across Colorado grapple with the realities of living paycheck to paycheck, more than a third of households in the U.S. face the daunting prospect of not being able to cover a $400 emergency.

This situation highlights the precariousness of financial stability for many, with nearly half of all Americans lacking any emergency savings, leaving them one paycheck away from disaster.

Jennifer C. Greenfield, an associate professor at the University of Denver’s Graduate School of Social Work, points to a growing trend among families that face hardships and find themselves in dire situations, such as shelters, due to economic crises triggered by seemingly small issues.

She illustrates this with the story of a mother of two, navigating life after losing her husband to COVID-19.

Working as a shift manager at a coffee shop, she barely makes enough to cover her rent and provide food for her children.

However, when flu season hits and her children fall ill, she quickly exhausts her sick days and ultimately loses her job.

Greenfield emphasizes that the social safety net in the U.S. is intended to support families like hers during tough times.

Programs like the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and Medicaid provide essential assistance, helping to bridge gaps as families strive to regain stability.

SNAP enables families to put food on the table, while Medicaid ensures that children have access to health care.

For many, tax time brings some hope, with the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) expected to provide necessary funds to secure housing and stability for their children.

However, proposed budget cuts working their way through Congress threaten to dismantle these vital programs.

If passed, estimates suggest that Colorado could lose as much as $259 million in federal funding for SNAP.

This loss would have devastating consequences, resulting in increased food insecurity for children and adverse economic ripple effects affecting local grocery stores, ranches, farms, and the trucking industry.

With fewer resources flowing through the system, many could ultimately find themselves unemployed.

In addition, the legislation also targets the EITC, making it more challenging for families to claim eligibility, limiting support primarily to families with children under age 7.

This restriction could lead to a significant number of Colorado families missing out on critical financial support that helps cover basic living expenses.

Without the EITC, families may struggle to secure deposits for housing, afford childcare that enables parents to work, or pay off essential bills like utilities.

Furthermore, Medicaid faces cuts as well, with new paperwork requirements likely to disenfranchise many eligible families from receiving coverage.

Additionally, reduced federal contributions to state Medicaid programs mean Colorado will have to make difficult decisions about funding other essential services, risking an increase in the number of uninsured individuals in the state.

Such cuts could jeopardize the viability of rural hospitals and nursing homes, dramatically affecting access to care in these communities and further increasing unemployment rates.

Greenfield warns that even a singular reduction in one of these crucial programs could have catastrophic ramifications.

The current legislative proposal bundles together cuts that threaten the very fabric of safety net programs, food supply chains, healthcare access, and the stability of both state and local budgets.

The underlying reasoning for such sweeping cuts has raised questions, particularly as they seem to be aimed at providing tax relief for the wealthiest Americans.

According to the Tax Policy Center, households earning between $460,000 and $1.1 million could receive an average tax cut of around $21,000.

Conversely, families making $30,000 or less annually might see an average loss of $800, which is roughly 4.5% of their total household income.

This bill, therefore, appears to disproportionately benefit those who are already financially secure at the expense of the most vulnerable members of society.

Greenfield urges Colorado’s Congressional delegation to unite against the proposed budget cuts, emphasizing that the bill undermines fiscal responsibility while simultaneously adding a staggering $2.4 trillion to the national debt over the next decade.

Additionally, the cuts will likely exacerbate poverty and diminish access to vital services, especially in Colorado’s rural and mountain regions, making it perplexing to support such measures.

In a time when support for low-income families is needed more than ever, these proposed cuts threaten to undo years of progress toward building a more inclusive and supportive safety net.

image source from:denverpost

Abigail Harper