In a significant legal development, the U.S. Supreme Court recently granted a decisive victory to the Trump administration by reinstating the power to terminate over 1,300 employees from the Department of Education (DOE).
These layoffs, which began in March, had previously been halted by a lower court ruling that mandated the reinstatement of the affected workers.
As the situation unfolds, Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro has taken a bold step by joining a coalition of Democratic states in a lawsuit against the federal government.
The lawsuit is centered around the withholding of billions in federal K-12 funding, which was poised to be distributed just before a critical deadline on July 1.
Gov. Shapiro has highlighted that this abrupt decision by the Trump administration has left Pennsylvania with a shortfall of approximately $230 million in education funds.
Data compiled by New America from fiscal year 2022 indicates that Philadelphia is among the districts facing the most significant losses nationwide due to this funding crisis.
Maura McInerney, the legal director at Education Law Center-PA, remarked, “This week’s developments underscore a dangerous executive overreach that threatens students in Pennsylvania and across the country. The consequences for students — especially the most marginalized — are dire.”
The core of Gov. Shapiro’s legal action revolves around forcing the Trump administration to deliver promised federal education funds that are critical for the state’s school districts to fulfill their budgets, train teachers, and maintain afterschool programs.
As Shapiro stated, “If anyone tries to hurt students here in Pennsylvania, they’ll have to go through me.”
The withheld funds have substantial implications for Philadelphia’s school district, which accounted for at least $26.9 million in the previous year’s budget.
Various funding streams have been affected, including Title II-A, responsible for teacher training, which previously provided Pennsylvania with $70 million, of which Philadelphia received $9.13 million.
Title III-A, aimed at supporting English-learning students, accounted for $20 million statewide and $4.6 million for Philly, while Title IV-A provided essential resources totaling $13.2 million to local schools.
Additionally, Title IV-B is associated with delivering $12.6 million amongst various Out-of-School Time providers in Philadelphia, which offer vital afterschool and summer programs for working families.
Concerns have emerged from providers like Sunrise of Philadelphia, which is uncertain about the possibility of sustaining their afterschool offerings without the anticipated funding.
Morgyn Yates, who directs K-12 programs upholds that they currently have many unanswered questions and are struggling to communicate with families regarding the future of these essential programs.
The implications are not just financial; dozens of positions within Pennsylvania’s Department of Education are financed by the withheld funds, jeopardizing staffing levels critical for the department’s functioning and support services.
The Supreme Court’s ruling, while an apparent win for the Trump administration, has not yet prompted immediate layoffs since many employees had already been on administrative leave with full pay since March.
U.S. District Judge Myong Joun had ruled previously in favor of the employees, asserting that the terminations could be seen as an attempt to dismantle the DOE, which is a power that only Congress holds.
The Trump administration, however, appealed this ruling, leading to the Supreme Court granting their emergency application which blocks the reinstatement order.
As a result of the Supreme Court’s decision, the affected employees, including the staff of Philadelphia’s regional Office for Civil Rights, are now set to be officially terminated.
Nonetheless, the legality of these layoffs remains under scrutiny in lower courts.
The consequences of these staffing reductions paint a grim picture for the DOE, which has seen its workforce cut to half, now only housing 2,183 of the original 4,133 employees.
This reduction has resulted in delays in crucial functions, such as the distribution of Title I funding, which has taken significantly longer compared to the previous year.
Moreover, an annual report on national educational data faced considerable delays and was ultimately released on a rolling basis with less information than in years past.
The closure of the Philadelphia Office for Civil Rights is particularly concerning, as it leaves families without access to vital legal mechanisms for addressing civil rights complaints.
This loss is especially detrimental to students with disabilities, who traditionally represent the majority of cases handled by the Office for Civil Rights.
McInerney expressed concern regarding the erosion of civil rights protections, affirming that the lack of federal enforcement on disability laws represents a catastrophic setback for those students who have thrived in supportive educational environments.
In summary, the recent Supreme Court decision and the lawsuit initiated by Governor Shapiro underscore a critical and contentious moment in education policy and funding in Pennsylvania, with significant ramifications for students, teachers, and educational equity.
As the legal battles continue, the fate of Pennsylvania’s educational landscape hangs in the balance, with stakeholders across the region hoping for a swift resolution that reinstates the much-needed funds.
image source from：whyy
