Nigel Farage, the leader of the Reform UK party, is slated to be evaluated in the upcoming local elections on Thursday.
Farage, a prominent figure in the Brexit movement and known for his far-right policies, aims to leverage the party’s growing support as a stepping stone to future national elections.
Currently holding just four out of 650 seats in the House of Commons, the Reform party secured 14% of votes in the previous year’s national elections.
Intriguingly, some recent polls indicate that the party’s support may now match or even exceed that of the governing Labour party and the opposing Conservatives.
Farage expressed ambitions to ‘completely change British history’ and emerge victorious in the next national elections, scheduled by August 2029.
His political agenda combines traditionally hardline stances on immigration and border control with approaches reminiscent of former US President Donald Trump’s administration.
In an innovative twist, Farage has revealed plans inspired by the Elon Musk-led Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) to introduce ‘a DOGE for every county’ in the UK.
He stated, “You bring the auditors in, find out why all this money is being spent on consultants and agency workers, end work from home — boom, gone, done, over.”
The Reform party resonates strongly with disenfranchised working-class voters who previously supported Labour, as well as social conservatives historically aligned with the Conservatives.
Given the Reform party’s rising prominence, discussions among some Conservatives about forming an electoral pact have emerged.
However, Farage has dismissed this notion, asserting that the Conservative party is likely to become insignificant by the time of the next election.
The rising popularity of the Reform party is causing unease among both Labour and Conservative leaders.
Tim Bale, a political professor at Queen Mary University of London, has warned that strong results for Farage’s party could compel major parties to align their immigration policies more closely with those of the Reform party.
He cautioned that this approach would likely backfire, advising against adopting radical right rhetoric or policies.
Critics portray Farage as a polarizing figure.
They accuse him of inciting social unrest, particularly following an incident in July where he insinuated that police were withholding details about a tragic dance class stabbing that resulted in three children’s deaths.
False assertions that the assailant was an asylum seeker led to violent protests throughout England.
Additionally, Farage’s views on immigration have drawn ire, as he has implied that many migrants come from cultures that are “alien to ours.”
Past controversies have followed Farage from his previous roles in other political parties, such as UKIP and the Brexit Party, leading to notable instances of infighting.
Nevertheless, the Reform party is reportedly striving to present a more polished image and professional operation.
Farage’s status as a staunch supporter of Trump may also influence his polling position, especially considering Trump’s unpopular standing in the UK.
Thus, Farage has sought to distance himself from certain Trump policies, including trade tariffs and the notion of Canada becoming the 51st state of the US.
In another significant geopolitical event, the US and Ukraine recently signed a deal that will allow Washington access to vital minerals and natural resources from Ukraine.
Ukrainian officials describe the agreement, finalized after extensive negotiations on Wednesday, as substantially more favorable to Ukraine than earlier drafts.
These prior versions had drawn heavy criticism for potentially relegating Kyiv to a subordinate status while granting the US extensive rights over Ukraine’s resources.
The agreement requires ratification by the Ukrainian parliament and is intended to facilitate a reconstruction fund, which officials in Kyiv hope will secure long-term military and financial support from the US.
Earlier negotiations stalled following a heated meeting at the Oval Office involving US President Donald Trump, Vice President JD Vance, and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy.
Ukrainian Economy Minister Yulia Svyrydenko emphasized the agreement as mutually beneficial.
“This is an agreement in which the United States notes its commitment to promoting long-term peace in Ukraine and recognizes the contribution that Ukraine has made to global security by giving up its nuclear arsenal,” she remarked.
The US State Department commended the deal, highlighting its potential to foster enduring economic partnerships based on security and peace.
Mignon Houston, Deputy Spokesperson for the State Department, emphasized the need for a robust economic partnership benefiting both nations and addressing the needs of the Ukrainian people.
“This agreement signals clearly to Russia that the Trump administration is committed to a peace process centered on a free, sovereign, and prosperous Ukraine over the long term,” stated Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent.
The deal encompasses various minerals and other critical resources, aiming to fortify strategic ties between the two nations.
However, it notably excludes resources that currently contribute to the Ukrainian state’s revenue.
The financial benefits from this deal rely on the success of new investments, while the agreement affirms Ukrainian ownership of the resources and grants the Ukrainian government authority over extraction decisions.
The text includes a list of 55 minerals, with provisions for additional agreements.
Key minerals featured in the agreement include rare earth elements, titanium, lithium, and uranium, all deemed vital for various sectors including aerospace and energy.
The newly established reconstruction investment fund envisioned by the agreement will also foster an equal involvement of both the US and Ukraine in its management.
Per Svyrydenko, the US government will support the fund through its International Development Finance Corporation, aiming to draw investments and technology from American and European entities.
Ukraine intends to allocate 50% of profits from its government-owned natural resources into the fund, which will also receive direct contributions from the US in terms of financial aid and equipment including military support.
The fund aims to reinvest profits toward projects related to infrastructure, mining, and petroleum.
For the first decade, profits accrued in the fund are not intended for distribution, allowing for reinvestment.
Initial proposals had suggested that the US might receive $500 billion in mineral profits as compensation for its wartime support, but President Zelenskyy rejected the idea of subjecting Ukraine to long-term debt.
As negotiations advance, Ukraine is prepared to finalize an agreement granting the US access to valuable rare minerals, addressing needs for ongoing American support against Russian aggression.
Ukrainian officials, including Svyrydenko, have characterized this agreement as fundamentally strategic for establishing an investment partnership.
Prime Minister Denys Shmyhal characterized the agreement as an equitable international deal for collaborative investment in Ukraine’s recovery and development.
In February, Trump had voiced interest in Ukraine’s rare earth materials, framing it as a condition for maintaining US support during the ongoing conflict.
However, discussions surrounding this agreement faced challenges, culminating in a tense Oval Office exchange that halted progress.
It remains unclear whether the Trump administration is willing to conclude the deal.
The United States is pursuing access to over 20 essential raw materials, including oil and natural gas, which are seen as strategically important.
Ukraine possesses valuable deposits of titanium, used in aerospace manufacturing, and uranium, significant for nuclear energy and military applications, alongside lithium, graphite, and manganese crucial for electric vehicle production.
After expressing concerns about an earlier draft favoring American interests excessively, Ukraine has worked to ensure more favorable provisions in the latest version.
This version outlines an equal partnership lasting ten years, with contributions distinguishing between prior military aid and prospective support.
Importantly, the deal aligns with Ukraine’s aspirations for European Union membership, crucial for the nation.
Before proceeding with the agreement, the Ukrainian Cabinet’s approval will be necessary, followed by ratification from the Ukrainian Parliament.
As diplomatic discussions unfold, Russian President Vladimir Putin has indicated a willingness to negotiate a ceasefire, albeit with conditions requiring clarification on various aspects.
Putin’s remarks were relayed through Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov, who emphasized the complexity of resolving the Ukrainian crisis promptly.
While the US seeks faster progress, Western leaders have pointed out ongoing territorial ambitions from Russia, as nearly a fifth of Ukrainian territory remains under Russian control since the invasion on February 24, 2022.
image source from：https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2025/05/01/washington-signs-historic-rare-earths-minerals-deal-with-ukraine
