President Donald Trump has voiced his discontent with Apple’s plans to manufacture most of its U.S. iPhones in India, threatening a hefty 25% tariff on the beloved device unless production shifts back to the United States.
This bold move underscores the ongoing complexities of the tech company’s long-standing relationship with China, where Apple has established vast factories and invested billions in a well-knit supply chain.
As a result of this reliance on overseas manufacturing, Apple has found itself in the crosshairs during Trump’s trade war with China.
In a recent statement, Apple CEO Tim Cook announced that most iPhones sold in the United States from March through June would be sourced from India, a revealing pivot amid the ongoing trade tensions.
Despite Trump’s initial introduction of sweeping tariffs during early April, he decided to exempt the iPhone and numerous electronics from these tariffs temporarily.
However, Cook has cautioned that the trade dispute has inflicted an additional cost of approximately $900 million on the company just in the March to June timeframe.
According to industry forecasts, if Trump’s tariffs were to proceed, the cost of a $1,200 iPhone produced in China could escalate to a staggering $1,500.
Yet analysts suggest that if Apple were to bring production back to the United States, retail prices could soar to between $2,000 and $3,500 — a potential hike that would dramatically impact consumer purchasing behavior.
Since the 1990s, Cook has been developing a complex supply chain in China that would not be easily replicated in the U.S.; hence, Shifting production domestically carries enormous hurdles.
Experts estimate that it could take years and cost billions to establish the necessary manufacturing infrastructure in the U.S., potentially driving the price of an iPhone to more than $3,000 if production were to relocate domestically.
Dan Ives, an analyst at Wedbush Securities, expressed skepticism about the feasibility of Apple’s transition to U.S. manufacturing, labeling the idea a ‘nonstarter.’
He believes that such a shift would not materialize until at least 2028, given the immense financial and logistical challenges involved.
Ives mentions that negotiation will likely be the company’s strategy to minimize the impact of Trump’s tariffs, allowing Apple to avoid the brunt of the potential economic burden.
The rapid growth of artificial intelligence also poses future uncertainties for Apple and other tech companies, as emerging hands-free and screen-free technology may reduce the overall demand for smartphones in the coming decade.
Eddy Cue, an Apple executive, recently noted the potential for a future where the iPhone might not be a necessity at all.
Currently, Apple has shown resilience against rising costs due to tariffs, maintaining that these have had a limited effect on the company, thanks to their optimized supply chain strategies.
However, Cook warned investors about the unpredictability of the situation beyond June, as the company’s future course remains uncertain in light of the tariffs.
A significant question looms over how Apple will respond if Trump’s threatened tariffs become a reality and consumers start absorbing higher costs.
Even without additional tariff escalations factored in, many analysts anticipate an impending price increase for iPhones, especially with the release of new models expected in the fall.
This pricing pressure may entice consumers to consider upgrading their devices before the costs potentially soar.
On the flip side, Apple’s ability to maintain its pricing structure can be credited in part to the substantial revenue generated from its services division, which gained momentum over the last fiscal year.
According to Forrester Research analyst Dipanjan Chatterjee, this aspect of the business remains unaffected by Trump’s tariffs, providing Apple with some breathing room to manage the increased costs.
However, Apple is now encountering a decline in service revenue, particularly after a recent court ruling that could prohibit the company from collecting commissions on transactions processed through payment systems other than its own within iPhone apps.
If Apple fails to secure a favorable outcome in their appeal of this ruling, they may face financial implications that could amount to billions annually.
In essence, the intersection of tariffs, evolving technology, and declining service revenue sets the stage for a pivotal moment in Apple’s strategy, leaving many questions unanswered about its future course of action.
image source from：https://chicago.suntimes.com/technology/2025/05/23/apple-iphones-trump-tariffs-united-states-china-manufacturing
