A recent ordinance approved by the Los Angeles City Council to raise the minimum wage for airport and hotel workers to $30 by 2028 has sparked significant debate regarding its potential impact on the local economy and housing crisis.
City Councilman Hugo Soto-Martinez passionately defended the measure, asserting, “This is what it looks like when working people come together and fight – we win.” He believes it addresses the long-standing issue of low wages for essential workers.
However, critics argue that this focus on wage increases is misguided and fails to tackle the root cause of housing unaffordability in Los Angeles—namely, a massive shortage of available homes.
In many areas, like Springfield, Massachusetts, $500,000 can buy a spacious, four-bedroom home, while those same funds may only afford a dilapidated property in Los Angeles, underscoring the stark differences in housing markets driven by local policies and zoning regulations.
The complexity of the housing crisis in California has been attributed to various factors including red tape, land use restrictions, and community resistance to new developments. Progress has been made in easing some of these restrictions in light of natural disasters, but housing supply remains critically low, leading to inflated prices.
By contrast, the focus on raising wages to address living costs may exacerbate the housing dilemma. When wages are increased without an accompanying growth in housing supply, landlords are likely to respond by raising rents, leaving many in the same precarious situation of affordability.
Recent experiences in California’s fast food sector illustrate the potential fallout from such policies. Assembly Bill 1228, which raised wages for fast food workers to $20, resulted in substantial job losses—23,100 fast food positions, according to a study by the Pepperdine School of Public Policy and Beacon Economics.
This study highlighted that while initial reports indicated no adverse effects, further analysis revealed significant job cuts and reductions in hours, undermining the intended benefits of the wage increase.
The implications of wage hikes are particularly concerning for low-skilled workers, who are often the first to experience job losses during economic shifts. As businesses grapple with rising labor costs, they may cut back on staffing, leading to fewer jobs or lower hours.
In the hospitality industry, the fallout is likely to be similar. The hospitality sector may face job losses and a diminishing number of hours worked, counteracting any financial gains workers may have experienced from the wage increases.
This is especially disheartening considering that hotel workers secured significant concessions last year through strikes and labor agreements, which already provided improved wages and staffing commitments.
A study by the California Center for Jobs and the Economy indicated that the introduction of increased labor costs might negatively affect both lower-skilled workers and those with less seniority. The long-term effects could lead to a surplus of job losses and reduced benefits across sectors reliant on minimum wage labor.
Furthermore, research from the University of California, San Francisco explored the reasons behind homelessness, revealing that job loss and income instability remain the most cited causes for losing housing.
This connection suggests that the very policies intended to protect vulnerable residents may inadvertently contribute to worsening the homelessness crisis in Los Angeles.
In summary, while the intent behind the wage hike ordinance is to support low-income workers, its potential economic ramifications raise serious concerns. The failure to address the underlying housing supply issue only perpetuates a cycle of affordability challenges in one of the nation’s most expensive real estate markets.
The city council’s decision, regardless of its good intentions, highlights a troubling pattern of short-sighted policies that hinder genuine progress and economic well-being in Los Angeles.
image source from：https://www.presstelegram.com/2025/05/30/las-30-wage-for-hotel-workers-will-backfire-on-those-politicians-think-theyre-helping/
