A sweeping Republican bill aimed at solidifying core elements of President Trump’s domestic policy has come under scrutiny, as an analysis from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) reveals it could increase the national debt by $2.4 trillion over the next decade.
The CBO’s findings also indicate that millions of Americans may lose health insurance coverage as a result of the proposed changes, directly contradicting claims made by GOP leaders that tax cuts would be offset by spending cuts and future economic growth.
This analysis comes in the wake of the House’s narrow passage of the legislation, raising concerns among fiscal conservatives that the plan’s fiscal rationale could fall apart as more details emerge.
Elon Musk’s recent criticism of the bill as “a disgusting abomination” has further amplified existing worries about the legislation’s cost. In response to these mounting concerns, Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., stated that modifications to the bill in the Senate would lead to significant growth, promising more robust cuts than those proposed in the House version.
Thune reinforced the importance of the bill’s success, declaring, “At the end of the day, failure is not an option. We are going to succeed.”
The GOP legislation not only seeks to extend Trump’s tax cuts but also aims to fulfill several of his campaign promises, including suspending taxes on tips and overtime during Trump’s second term while reshaping immigration and energy policies.
According to the CBO analysis, the extension of the tax cut program will be a primary driver of future deficits. In order to finance this plan, the Republican bill proposes slashing spending on crucial safety net programs.
Programs potentially impacted include the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), previously known as food stamps, and Medicaid, the federal/state program serving low-income, elderly, and disabled Americans.
The CBO estimates that nearly 11 million Americans could lose their health insurance due to proposed changes to Medicaid, which would implement new work requirements, shorten enrollment periods, and aim to eliminate what lawmakers describe as “waste, fraud, and abuse” within the system.
States would bear the burden of potentially heavy administrative costs associated with enforcing these employment verification processes.
Despite these findings, the CBO has faced criticism from both the White House and Congressional Republicans, some of whom have suggested, without evidence, that the agency is pursuing a partisan agenda.
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt specifically claimed that the CBO had shifted to become more “partisan and political,” despite its current director, Phillip L. Swagel, having served under the George W. Bush administration.
The CBO’s analysis aligns with other nonpartisan estimates indicating that the legislation is likely to exacerbate national deficits, putting additional pressure on Republican leaders to reassess the bill.
As Senate Republicans prepare to revise the House-backed legislation, critical disagreements remain. One major sticking point is the proposed changes to Medicaid.
The House’s plan introduces work requirements for non-disabled recipients without children, a measure backed by many Republican senators, but some members express concerns about the significant cuts to the program itself.
Senator Josh Hawley of Missouri, for example, voiced his opposition in an opinion piece for The New York Times, stating, “Don’t Cut Medicaid.”
Another contentious issue centers around the State and Local Tax (SALT) deduction, which has been a hot topic within the House but presents a different dynamic in the Senate.
Blue-state Republicans pushed for a higher deduction cap in the House, yet their counterparts in the Senate, where representatives from high-tax states are absent, have shown resistance.
Senators, including Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, have already expressed their opposition to including SALT in the Senate version of the bill.
Finally, the House’s proposal to roll back clean energy tax credits, established during the Biden administration, has drawn concern from several Senate Republicans who warned that such actions could jeopardize capital allocation, project planning, and job creation in the energy sector.
Given that Republicans can only afford to lose three votes in the Senate, the mixed sentiments create uncertainty about the path forward for the bill as it undergoes critical revisions.
As the Senate works to reshape the bill, the ramifications of the CBO’s analysis will likely play a crucial role in determining the final outcome of this pivotal legislative effort.
image source from：https://www.npr.org/2025/06/04/g-s1-70435/cbo-trump-republican-bill-deficit
