The Southern Baptist Convention (SBC), the largest Protestant denomination in the United States with approximately 12.7 million members, held its annual meeting this month in Dallas, Texas, where votes on significant proposals highlighted the conservative ideology of the group.
On the last day of the convention, two key proposals met with close call results but ultimately failed, underscoring the dynamics within the denomination.
A proposed amendment aimed at formally banning women from serving as pastors was defeated yet again, having received roughly 61% of the votes—falling short of the two-thirds majority needed for adoption.
The amendment’s proponent, Juan Sanchez, a pastor from Austin, argued for clearer guidelines concerning the denomination’s restrictive stance on women holding pastoral titles. He expressed the need for clarification on what the SBC’s Baptist Faith and Message states regarding women as pastors, particularly in light of differing interpretations across various churches.
Since the year 2000, the SBC’s nonbinding statement of faith has specified that only men can occupy the role of pastor.
However, interpretations have varied, leading to confusion about whether this restriction applies to associate pastoral roles such as women’s or children’s ministry pastors, provided the senior pastor is male.
The failure to amend the constitution against women pastors for the second consecutive year reflects an ongoing contention within the SBC regarding women’s roles in ministry.
Throughout the convention, discussions centered around multiple topics, although SBC President Clint Pressley noted that the atmosphere was not overtly contentious. He emphasized that the convention meeting, which took place from June 8 to June 11 at the Kay Bailey Hutchison Convention Center in downtown Dallas, brought together between 18,000 and 20,000 attendees.
In addition to the debate on women pastors, another significant proposal aimed at abolishing the Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission (ERLC) was also narrowly defeated, garnering about 43% support from voting delegates.
Critics like Daily Wire writer Megan Basham pointed out that this close margin indicates a faction within the Southern Baptist community that desires to distance its political representatives from perceived compromises on core issues such as immigration and abortion.
The ERLC serves as the public policy wing of the SBC, striving to implement biblical principles in political discussions, yet it has drawn criticism for being ineffective and insufficiently conservative. Basham’s critiques were encapsulated in her upcoming book, “Shepherds for Sale: How Evangelical Leaders Traded the Truth for a Leftist Agenda,” where she chastises the agency for allegedly bending to moderate influences and prioritizing compromise.
Willy Rice, a preacher from Florida who introduced the proposal to dissolve the ERLC, sought to wake up the commission regarding its perceived failings. He explicitly referenced Basham’s critique during his speech, implying that the SBC should maintain its conservative integrity. Rice concluded by reminding the convention, “this Southern Baptist Convention is not for sale.”
Amid these debates, the financial health of SBC seminaries was also a point of discussion, with leaders from these institutions sharing updates on their operations. David Dockery, president of Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary, announced significant financial improvements, including the removal of short-term debt and a rise in total net assets by more than $20 million.
However, Dockery also noted a concerning 20-year history of overspending that totaled $140 million. This financial depth adds another layer to the complexities faced by the larger SBC community.
As the convention concluded, voices of dissent echoed through the crowd. Notably, Beth Allison Barr, a historian from Baylor University who focuses on church history and women’s roles, expressed her dismay over the ongoing efforts to further limit what women can achieve within the church framework.
She articulated frustration over the persistent logic asserting that restricting women’s roles in leadership somehow equates to granting them freedom, pointing out the disconnect in that rationale.
Moreover, the convention’s failures to enact a definitive ban on women pastors or abolish the ERLC suggest a significant divide within the SBC constituency regarding their values and direction.
While a majority may align with conservative interpretations of scriptural texts regarding leadership roles, the close voting margins highlight an undercurrent of dissent among Southern Baptists regarding the denomination’s future trajectory and approach to critical social issues.
In summation, the Southern Baptist Convention’s recent decisions seem to mirror a broader struggle between tradition and modernity within evangelical circles, as members grapple with doctrinal interpretations and their implications for women and public policy engagements. As debates continue, the SBC’s ability to navigate these contentious waters will likely shape its identity and influence in years to come.
image source from：https://www.dallasnews.com/news/faith/2025/06/11/after-narrow-key-votes-southern-baptists-leave-dallas-with-bylaws-unchanged/
