In a significant turn of events, Dallas Independent School District (DISD) is considering amendments to its equity policy, originally adopted in 2018, which aimed to promote systemic racial equity in education.
The discussion around the proposed changes arises from increasing state and national pressures against diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives, particularly in Texas, where recent legislative actions have called for a reconsideration of such policies.
At a recent board briefing, trustees deliberated on the possibility of stripping the word “equity” from the policy, raising concerns about what it means for the district’s long-standing commitment to its values.
Pam Lear, a DISD deputy superintendent, emphasized that the changes are not a retreat from the district’s core principles but rather a necessity to ensure compliance with evolving legal frameworks.
Trustee Byron Sanders articulated the need for clear communication with families, asserting, “Folks are going to need to know that we are still here, that we’re not retreating, that we are not changing who we are.”
The proposed policy revision includes a commitment to the success of all students, stating, “The District shall systematically and systemically improve its practices to achieve and maintain accountability in education.”
This language signifies an intention to ensure fair treatment of all students, acknowledging their unique circumstances and advocating for tailored resources as needed.
This shift in policy comes as part of a broader movement led by Republican lawmakers against DEI initiatives. In Texas, the Legislature has recently enacted a sweeping “DEI ban,” while President Donald Trump’s administration has threatened to withdraw federal funding from districts that do not comply with demands to eliminate DEI practices.
The pushback against DEI has sparked a contentious debate, with opponents arguing that such practices harm white children.
Aware of the changing political landscape, DISD leadership has already initiated several related alterations.
In May, the district modified an employment practices document by removing a section that emphasized recruitment and retention through a DEI lens.
Additionally, Lear’s job title was adjusted to remove any reference to racial equity initiatives.
Moreover, the Racial Equity Office’s webpage, which previously showcased benchmarks tracking progress for Black students, now leads to an error message.
Superintendent Stephanie Elizalde reassured stakeholders that while the terminology may change, the district’s mission remains intact.
“Adults are driving the climate in which we are in, but students will always come first,” Elizalde stated, stressing the importance of prioritizing the needs of the district’s 140,000 students over political controversies.
The proposed changes to the policy would reflect a crucial transition for Dallas ISD, known for being at the forefront of educational equity efforts.
With a student demographic comprising about 70% Hispanic and roughly 20% Black children, the district has focused on addressing longstanding disparities that disproportionately affect underrepresented groups.
Historically, Dallas ISD has implemented various programs aimed at correcting inequities in discipline and participation in advanced classes for Black students.
Elizalde affirmed, “We have never disadvantaged one group for the purposes of advantaging another. We’ve responded to the data. The data said students needed help.”
She added that help often targeted students of color, driven by their specific academic needs rather than any agenda against others.
The latest proposal reiterates a commitment to closely tracking data concerning African American and English language learners to assess the impact of district systems on these populations.
Sanders emphasized the necessity for the district to continue bridging gaps between different demographic groups.
“We need to be empowered — our staff needs to be empowered — with a mandate from the board, and policy, to do just that,” he stated.
Former DISD trustee Maxie Johnson urged for transparency as the district navigates these challenges, reflecting on the community engagement that accompanied the initial equity policy’s adoption.
According to Johnson, the district has room for improvement but can rise to meet the demands of the current situation.
Sanders, who succeeded Johnson on the board, expressed initial concerns regarding the proposed amendments but acknowledged the reality that Texas schools must comply with state laws and timelines.
While Sanders is not in favor of accelerating the revision process, he understands the urgency imposed by the prevailing political climate.
When the original equity policy was established, board members emphasized the need to address historical injustices and the district’s role in them.
With the district achieving official desegregation in 2003, nearly five decades post-Brown v. Board of Education, the significance of acknowledging institutional racism was a fundamental pillar.
The proposed changes would remove the policy’s acknowledgment of “the history of institutional racism,” potentially signaling a departure from critical historical context.
Additionally, the district discussed modifying its purchasing policy to transition from encouraging the use of women and minority-owned businesses toward a “race neutral” approach that supports small business enterprises.
As Dallas ISD navigates these challenges, the implications of any changes to its equity policy will undoubtedly shape its commitment to serving a diverse student population amidst shifting political tides.
image source from：https://www.dallasnews.com/news/education/2025/06/12/dallas-schools-could-revise-equity-policy-after-anti-dei-bill-trumps-orders/
