The current lab courses at Northeastern University are drawing criticism from students, particularly those studying behavioral neuroscience.
Many students echo the sentiment that the demanding nature of these courses fails to support genuine comprehension of scientific principles.
As a behavioral neuroscience major, I’ve experienced firsthand the challenges that come with the rigorous lab report writing typical of Northeastern.
For instance, during the physics lab, I found myself dedicating countless hours detailing experimental setups, analyzing data, and crafting lengthy reports.
While such tasks are undoubtedly important, a significant portion of this work felt like busywork, leaving me questioning the relevance of these experiments.
With a substantial percentage of science majors eventually pursuing non-STEM careers, the necessity of spending extensive time on lab reports raises a pertinent question: Why invest so much effort into research writing if it doesn’t directly align with our future professional paths?
Beyond the written assignments, the structure of Northeastern’s in-person lab courses presents additional challenges.
Due to the restricted time and limited laboratory resources, students often conduct experiments only once, putting immense pressure on them to execute intricate procedures perfectly on the first try.
This lack of repetition not only hinders learning but also complicates the mastery of essential concepts.
Moreover, safety regulations compel students to strictly adhere to protocols, which diverts attention from the critical understanding we strive to achieve.
In an environment fraught with pressure, some students may even opt to underperform to avoid the stress associated with potential errors, which ultimately prioritizes self-preservation over true academic success.
Despite these shortcomings, I firmly believe in the significance of lab courses, which is why I am so passionate about enacting change.
For many students, especially visual learners like myself, hands-on lab experiences are crucial for translating abstract theories into tangible understanding.
Given the benefits of active participation in experimental learning, should our engagement not be recognized and valued?
Northeastern emphasizes experiential learning, preparing students for a dynamic world that often does not conform to standard procedures.
This principle should be reflected in lab courses, serving not only as venues for memorization but also as opportunities to grasp and apply knowledge in practical contexts.
Students should not be treated as mere automatons whose abilities are limited to executing predetermined tasks.
To enhance experiential learning, a fundamental change should be made by replacing time-consuming, busywork lab reports with assessments focused on real understanding.
For example, in the Biology Project Lab, students rotated through various stations, applying techniques in real-world scenarios that scientists face, which effectively mirrors the ever-pressing challenges encountered in the field.
Additionally, Northeastern expanded its educational approach during the COVID-19 pandemic by introducing highly interactive lab modules aimed at familiarizing students with various laboratory skills.
The self-directed nature of these digital simulations allowed students to repeat experiments at their own pace—ideal for memory retention, which often requires multiple attempts for comprehension.
An innovative approach worth considering is the “argument-driven inquiry model,” introduced by chemistry professor Joi Walker at East Carolina University.
Walker observed notable enhancements in student understanding after transforming the traditional lab format into a multi-week experience, empowering students to design and conduct their own experiments while engaging in meaningful discussions and cultivating scientific arguments.
Ultimately, lab courses possess the potential to be among the most enriching experiences a college student can undertake.
By shifting emphasis from tedious lab reports and stringent protocols to a focus on comprehensive understanding, students can leave with more than just basic skills; they’ll develop critical thinking, adaptive reasoning, and the ability to navigate any scientific challenge they may face.
In summary, revamping Northeastern’s lab courses is urgently needed to align with the true essence of experiential learning and equip students for success in a diverse array of future endeavors.
image source from：https://huntnewsnu.com/87276/uncategorized/op-ed-northeastern-lab-courses-must-prioritize-in-depth-learning/
