The San Diego Humane Society has seen a significant increase in contributions and grants over the past five years, with total assets reaching $133 million, nearly double the $70 million reported five years ago.
However, the organization is currently facing challenges as San Diego Mayor Todd Gloria announced a proposed 20% reduction in city payments to its animal-services contractor, translating to a $3.5 million cut aimed at addressing a quarter-billion-dollar budget deficit.
The Humane Society’s leadership quickly responded to the announcement, warning that such a reduction could threaten their ability to provide essential services to the city.
Chief Executive Gary Weitzman expressed concerns that the cuts would not just affect specific services but would have a widespread impact across their operations, making it untenable to continue the contract with the city.
In response to these dire warnings, the proposed budget cut was revised to a $1.5 million reduction, although negotiations around the $18.2 million contract for the coming year are ongoing.
Despite the organization’s robust financial standing, it is encountering a mounting number of public complaints and criticism.
A county grand jury report recently revealed failures in meeting contractual obligations, and the Humane Society is currently embroiled in a lawsuit over its community cat program, which facilitates the release of stray cats without supervision.
After a judicial intervention halted the program last year, the Humane Society revised its operations, with a final ruling expected imminently.
Activists and volunteers have voiced frustrations about the Humane Society not doing enough to provide affordable spaying and neutering services, a critical measure to combat the ongoing homelessness of animals.
Additionally, volunteers, numbering over 4,000, have expressed feeling undervalued and sidelined from meaningful involvement in the organization’s mission.
In contrast, the nonprofit has recorded escalating executive salaries, with Weitzman’s base pay reaching $488,000 last year – a significant increase over the past five years.
This trend in rising compensation for senior staff has led to disillusionment among some animal advocates, with calls for greater oversight and accountability.
Critics argue that while additional funding may be necessary, current leadership has demonstrated a lack of effectiveness in addressing existing issues.
The Humane Society dismissed the grand jury findings as biased, asserting that they represent mischaracterizations of its staff and practices.
In a statement, the organization defended its responses to proposed budget cuts, citing that most of its substantial assets are tied up in real estate or earmarked for specific projects.
The organization highlights the advances it has made in the field of animal welfare, despite the operational challenges it faces.
The San Diego Humane Society, established in 1880, has a long history in the region and has evolved to become one of the most well-funded animal-welfare agencies in the United States.
It has largely expanded its responsibilities over the past decade, absorbing many duties previously managed by San Diego County following budget cuts to the county’s animal-control services.
Now serving as the enforcement agency for 14 of the county’s 18 cities and possessing police powers, the Humane Society is the go-to for animal-related issues across San Diego.
Despite the significant increase in revenue, questions have arisen about whether the organization’s performance justifies its higher operating costs.
The grand jury’s report highlighted a deterioration in service levels, noting a remarkable drop in citations for violations of leash laws and unmet emergency response times.
Furthermore, it was revealed that response times for urgent calls frequently exceeded the stipulated timeframes outlined in contracts with the city, raising alarms about the efficacy of the Humane Society.
Acknowledging staffing challenges, the organization pointed to difficulties in hiring and onboarding personnel for humane law enforcement roles.
Inconsistencies in service provision and the lack of accountability from the city government in monitoring the Humane Society’s compliance with contractual obligations were also noted by the grand jury.
As the city prepares its formal response to the findings, the Humane Society has pushed back against the criticisms, maintaining its commitment to enforcing animal welfare laws.
Discussions around animal welfare in San Diego have long been contentious, with advocates frequently pushing for more effective practices in shelters and outreach.
Calls for the Humane Society to allocate more resources towards preventative measures, such as affordable spaying and neutering services, have grown louder amid ongoing struggles concerning animal overpopulation.
Nicole Donnelly, a board member of the Spay-Neuter Action Project, indicated that investing in pet owner education and affordable services could significantly reduce shelter overcrowding.
The Humane Society reported performing over 22,000 spay and neuter surgeries in the previous year and aims to expand its community programs in the near future.
Past scandals have further complicated the organization’s reputation, including a contentious incident two years ago involving the transfer of over 300 small animals to another shelter, where many were ultimately fed to snakes.
Despite the fallout from that incident, the Humane Society has remained largely resistant to calls for transparency, fostering distrust among advocates and members of the public.
Many volunteers report feelings of disenfranchisement, with complaints about limited opportunities for meaningful engagement and a preference for operational control over community involvement.
Some former volunteers, citing a lack of appreciation and opportunities to contribute their expertise, have ceased their participation entirely, leading to concerns regarding the organization’s volunteer management strategy.
The San Diego Humane Society has responded by asserting that all volunteer contributions are deployed effectively to meet organizational needs, although transparency remains an area of contention.
With a $10 million capital campaign underway for the development of a veterinary hospital, the organization hopes to further enhance its service offerings in the community.
The establishment of a public-access veterinary facility is targeted for completion by 2027 and aims to alleviate the burden on pet owners across the county.
As the debate over funding, performance, and accountability continues, the San Diego Humane Society finds itself at a crossroads, balancing community expectations with internal and external pressures.
image source from：https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/2025/06/01/meeting-its-mission-criticism-of-san-diego-humane-society-piles-up-in-wake-of-grand-jury-report-proposed-budget-cut/
