President Donald Trump has issued an ultimatum to Russia, demanding that it accept a peace deal regarding the ongoing conflict in Ukraine within 50 days or face significant sanctions targeting its energy exports.
This ultimatum has reportedly provided the Kremlin with an extended timeframe to advance its military offensive throughout the summer.
However, the persistent resistance from Ukrainian forces makes it unlikely for the Russian military to achieve rapid gains.
President Vladimir Putin has consistently stated that any peace negotiations must include Ukraine’s withdrawal from the four regions that Russia unlawfully annexed in September 2022, though Moscow has never fully taken control of these areas.
He has also insisted that Ukraine must abandon its NATO aspirations and accept stringent limitations on its military capacity — stipulations that Kyiv and its Western allies have firmly rejected.
Due to an ongoing depletion of manpower and weaponry, Ukrainian forces are now primarily focused on defending their positions rather than launching counteroffensives.
Despite a surge in Russian military activity and a series of aerial assaults on Kyiv and other urban centers, Ukrainian officials and military analysts remain skeptical about Moscow’s ability to secure a significant territorial advantage in the short 50-day window, which would compel Ukraine to acquiesce to Kremlin demands.
Russian military efforts have seen a concentrated push in eastern Ukraine, with troops registering notable territorial gains since spring.
Currently, Russian forces are aiming to capture key strongholds such as Pokrovsk and Kostyantynivka in the Donetsk region, methodically advancing by seizing control of surrounding villages aimed at interrupting supply lines and encircling Ukrainian defenders.
This slow but persistent offensive has been ongoing for several months.
The capture of these strongholds would enable Russia to move towards Slovyansk and Kramatorsk, paving the way for potential domination over the entire Donetsk region.
Should Russian forces successfully take control of these strategic positions, they could extend their operations west toward the Dnipropetrovsk region, wherein the regional capital of Dnipro — a major industrial center with a population of nearly one million — lies approximately 150 kilometers (over 90 miles) away from Russian lines.
The escalation of conflict into Dnipropetrovsk could negatively impact Ukrainian morale and provide Moscow with greater bargaining power in any ongoing negotiations.
In the Luhansk region, Ukrainian forces maintain a minor area of control, though Moscow appears to be sidelining its capture in favor of other military priorities.
Conversely, the situation in the Kherson and Zaporizhzhia regions remains complex, with total Russian takeover still far from realization.
In the early stages of the conflict, Russian forces swiftly captured the Kherson region but faced significant setbacks and were pushed out by Ukrainian forces in November 2022, leading to a retreat to the eastern bank of the Dnieper River.
Any new attempts to reinforce their presence in the region would pose substantial challenges, particularly considering Moscow’s current limitations.
Similarly, fully seizing control of the Zaporizhzhia region presents difficulties that have yet to be overcome.
Moscow’s military focus has also shifted to establishing a ‘buffer zone’ in the northeastern Sumy region, where they regained control of several villages after Ukrainian troops conducted unexpected incursions into Russia’s Kursk region in August 2024.
Lieutenant General Vladimir Putin has characterized these initiatives as necessary for safeguarding Russian territory from potential Ukrainian assaults.
Despite Putin indicating that capturing the Sumy regional capital — a significant city of 268,000 located just 30 kilometers (less than 20 miles) from the border — is not an immediate objective, analysts assert that Russian forces lack the capability for such an operation presently.
In the neighboring Kharkiv region, there have been efforts to launch offensives, though notable advancements against the fierce resistance posed by Ukrainian troops have not materialized.
Some experts speculate that Moscow might hope to leverage recent territorial gains in the Sumy and Kharkiv regions as strategic negotiating tools, possibly trading these areas for parts of the Donetsk region that remain under Ukrainian control.
According to Mikhail Karyagin, a Kremlin-friendly political expert, a scenario of territorial exchanges during negotiations is “quite realistic.”
Ukrainian commanders have expressed that the volume and rate of Russian attacks indicate that meaningful tactical advantages are out of reach for Moscow’s forces.
The slow progression of their offensive suggests high attrition rates within Russian ranks, as they strive to encumber Ukrainian defenses.
Although Ukrainian forces are feeling the weight of being outnumbered and outgunned, they continue to rely on advanced drone technology to counter the advancing Russian troops.
Both sides are heavily utilizing drones not only to surveil troop movements but also to pinpoint targets for swift attacks, even against individual soldiers.
Military commentators from Russia acknowledge that Ukraine’s drone capabilities significantly hinder Moscow’s ability to make quick territorial gains.
The prevailing Russian strategy appears to aim at applying slow, sustained pressure through a method of “a thousand cuts,” targeting multiple front sectors while simultaneously increasing long-range aerial assaults on essential infrastructures.
Moscow-based military analyst Sergei Poletayev highlighted that the goal of the Russian military is to exhaust Ukrainian forces to a point where they can no longer effectively defend their positions, ultimately aiming for multiple minor advances that converge into major strategic victories.
Importantly, the continued provision of military supplies from Western allies is vital for supporting Ukraine’s defense.
Reports indicate that delays and uncertainties surrounding U.S. military aid have led Ukrainian troops to ration ammunition and reduce operational activities amidst the intensifying Russian offensives.
President Donald Trump and U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio have stated that the United States plans to sell military equipment to NATO allies in Europe so that they can further supply Ukraine with necessary weapons, including the highly sought-after Patriot air defense systems.
Analysts emphasize the urgency for accelerated weapon shipments from European allies to empower Ukraine to withstand the ongoing Russian offensive effectively.
Jack Watling from the Royal United Services Institute in London stated that the speed and pressure of the Russian advance are mounting significant challenges for Ukrainian armed forces.
However, he also underscored that Europe’s capabilities could fulfill much of Ukraine’s military needs — provided that essential arms can be acquired from the U.S. without undue delay.
This geopolitical backdrop underscores the critical balance of power in the ongoing conflict, as stakes remain high in both military and diplomatic arenas.
image source from：apnews
