Under the Trump administration, U.S. immigration enforcement has broadened, impacting not only border crossers but also legal residents.
Even those with minor past convictions now face detention, with reports of international students and workers being arrested without clear violations, particularly those involved in activism related to the Israel-Hamas conflict.
Legal representation in deportation cases remains scarce.
The expedited removal processes have increased, intensifying the risks for many immigrants who previously felt secure in their legal status.
The Trump administration has significantly changed how immigration laws are enforced across the United States, expanding the pool of individuals who may face arrest or deportation.
While earlier efforts primarily focused on those crossing the border, current enforcement actions now encompass millions who are already living in the country.
This group includes individuals with temporary visas, green cards, and those otherwise in legal status.
Historically, immigrants with legal residency, including green card holders, could face deportation if convicted of certain crimes.
However, the current administration has expanded the definition of priority cases to include individuals with old or minor convictions.
As a result, many residents who previously enjoyed a degree of security now find themselves detained.
In some concerning instances, immigration officers have arrested international students, workers, and legal residents with no charges against them.
These arrests have frequently involved individuals engaged in political activism related to the Israel-Hamas conflict, with several of these cases now making their way through the courts.
The risk of deportation has always existed for foreign students who break visa conditions or stop attending classes.
However, the recent shift in enforcement policies has seen some students and legal workers arrested without any clear violations, leading to ongoing legal challenges.
Immigrants facing deportation proceedings are often not provided government-appointed lawyers to represent them.
According to a New York Times analysis, only 32% of individuals in these proceedings had legal representation as of 2024.
While the government provides legal assistance for unaccompanied minors crossing the border, efforts by the Trump administration to end this support may soon be halted due to a judge’s ruling restoring temporary funding.
The Trump administration has also increased reliance on “expedited removal,” a process that allows authorities to deport individuals who have been in the country for less than two years without any court hearing.
Another seldom-used law, the Alien Enemies Act, has been revived in this context.
This 1798 law permits the president to deport individuals during times of war or conflict.
Recently, the Supreme Court ruled that the government could utilize this law but mandated that those affected must be notified and allowed to challenge the action in court.
Mistaken deportations underline the flawed nature of current enforcement practices.
A notable example is Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia, a legal resident who was deported to El Salvador erroneously without a court order.
Officials referred to this as an “administrative error.”
Although a federal court ordered his return, the administration has claimed compliance is not possible, with the Supreme Court now reviewing the case.
Legal residents are eligible for certain public benefits, depending on state law.
Most must wait five years before qualifying for Medicaid coverage.
In contrast, undocumented immigrants can obtain driver’s licenses in 19 states, Washington D.C., and Puerto Rico despite their status.
At border crossings and airports, immigration officers now possess broader authority.
They can inspect luggage, check cell phones, and even monitor social media activity without any evidence of criminal behavior.
In some cases, foreigners have been denied entry based on social media posts critical of the U.S. or its allies, prompting some nations to issue travel advisories for those planning to visit the United States.
These developments suggest a significant shift in how immigrant communities in the United States are treated and highlight the growing need for legal advocacy and reform in immigration policies.
image source from：https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/nri/migrate/what-rights-do-immigrants-in-the-united-states-have-and-how-are-they-changing-under-trump/articleshow/120248188.cms?from=mdr
