In recent weeks, the United States’ relationship with Israel has been engulfed in crisis, creating significant diplomatic rifts.
When U.S. President Donald Trump embarked on his inaugural visit to the Middle East in May, he notably omitted Jerusalem from his itinerary, opting instead for Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates.
This oversight of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has fueled speculation about shifting dynamics in American regional diplomacy.
Against Israel’s wishes, Trump has engaged in direct negotiations with some of Israel’s most prominent adversaries, including Iran and Hamas, while also reaching out to the Yemeni Houthis, a group known for launching missiles into Israeli territory.
Additionally, Trump met with Syria’s former jihadist leader, openly praising him as “tough” and “attractive.”
For critics of Netanyahu, Trump’s actions represent a refreshing departure from the Israeli Prime Minister’s longstanding insistence on a close alliance with the U.S.
Historically, successive U.S. administrations have aligned their Middle East policies with Washington’s geopolitical objectives, often setting aside Israel’s interests when necessary.
Trump’s first term, marked by unyielding support for Israel, appears increasingly as an anomaly when viewed through the lens of American foreign policy history.
The second term, however, shows signs of reverting to traditional patterns, indicative of the complexities that characterize U.S.-Israeli relations.
While the U.S. has provided Israel with considerable leeway regarding its treatment of the Palestinians, the record shows that no American president has ever effectively compelled Israel to halt its settlement expansion or occupation of Palestinian territories.
Under Trump, the U.S. remains a crucial ally for Israel, serving as both a security guarantor and a diplomatic shield.
Netanyahu’s ability to wage war in Gaza has occurred under the protective umbrella of American consent, as Trump often refrains from imposing significant constraints on Israel’s military actions.
Even as American pressure occasionally nudges Israel to allow humanitarian aid into Gaza, it becomes evident that Washington’s support for Israel’s actions has remained largely unwavering.
Trump’s remarks about the “voluntary emigration” of Palestinians from Gaza align closely with the ambitions of Netanyahu’s right-wing coalition.
Following a short-lived ceasefire that was breached by Israel, the Prime Minister expressed his intent to reoccupy Gaza entirely and neutralize Hamas, further solidifying this pattern of U.S. complicity.
For nearly eight decades, the U.S.-Israeli alliance has weathered political upheavals and changing global landscapes.
Truman’s swift recognition of Israel immediately post-independence in 1948 set a precedent for subsequent administrations, which have historically shielded Israel from criticism, often dismissing objections from both human rights advocates and realpolitik analysts.
Israel has grown increasingly reliant on American military and diplomatic support, but has nevertheless experienced moments where Washington imposed limits on its actions due to geopolitical interests.
For instance, during the 1948 Arab-Israeli War, Truman, while recognizing Israel, also enforced an arms embargo against its enemies.
Even as Israel enjoyed territorial gains, its ambitions were tempered when Truman compelled Ben-Gurion to withdraw from the Sinai Peninsula, highlighting limits on Israel’s autonomy when its actions threatened U.S. interests.
In the ensuing years, the U.S. maintained a cautious distance from Israel, particularly in the early 1950s, as it sought alliances with stable Arab regimes.
However, the dynamic shifted during the Suez Crisis in 1956, when Israel faced U.S. discontent after attempting to overthrow Nasser alongside British and French forces.
Eisenhower’s displeasure led to another forced Israeli withdrawal, reinforcing the notion that Israel could not act freely only based on its own interests.
By the late 1960s and 1970s, as Cold War tensions escalated, Israel’s relationship with Washington evolved into one of deeper military and economic ties, solidified further by its strategic importance to the U.S. in the region.
Despite these strengthened ties, historical precedent shows that U.S. administrations have not hesitated to leverage their influence to extract concessions from Israel regarding its neighbors, most notably in the context of the Egyptian-Israeli peace process.
After Israel’s occupation of additional territories in 1967, the U.S. ultimately compelled Israel to return the Sinai in exchange for peace with Egypt—a pivotal agreement that established a new regional order.
This ongoing complexity has defined how U.S.-Israeli relations have functioned even after the conclusion of the Cold War.
Washington’s consistent protection of Israel in international forums often coexisted with instances of the U.S. curtailing Israeli actions deemed detrimental to broader U.S. interests.
Under Trump, this alignment shifted markedly.
Unlike any previous U.S. president, Trump’s policies unapologetically sided with Israel, moving the American embassy to Jerusalem and dismantling various diplomatic channels with the Palestinians.
These actions culminated in the Abraham Accords, which normalized relations between Israel and several Arab nations but did so without authentic representation for Palestinian interests.
President Biden has continued this trajectory, maintaining Trump’s policies and even attempting to expand them.
Biden’s administration has evidenced an unwavering commitment to Israel’s security amid rising tensions, particularly following attacks from Hamas and Iranian proxies that have intensified military cooperation in the region.
Despite Biden’s occasional critiques regarding humanitarian issues, the overarching strategy has leaned heavily toward accommodating Israeli military interests, revealing a broader pattern of continued American support regardless of the humanitarian crisis in Gaza.
In the early phases of Trump’s second term, Netanyahu found himself seemingly in a position of strength as the American political landscape shifted back in favor of a formerly favorable ally.
The dynamics of this relationship may soon illustrate the consistent U.S. policy concerning Israel, even in the face of his more controversial initiatives regarding Iran and the broader Middle East.
Trump’s initiation of direct U.S. talks concerning a new nuclear agreement with Iran came to light, complicating Netanyahu’s ambitions and prompting fears within Israeli security circles of American reluctance to enable military preemptive action.
The future trajectory of U.S.-Israeli relations remains ambiguous.
While Trump’s presidency has not fundamentally altered the special relationship, it has propelled it back towards traditional patterns where the U.S. navigates its interests independently while still offering support to Israel regarding Palestinian matters.
As the situation in Gaza evolves, the imbalanced dynamics and ongoing violence remind us that the complexities of this relationship will persist, illustrating how American decisions will continue to impact the region profoundly.
image source from：https://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/america-and-israel-follow-same-old-script
