In Los Angeles, where parking spots and affordable apartments seem to be a scarce commodity, a new proposal from city council members aims to shake things up.
Councilmembers Bob Blumenfield and Nithya Raman introduced a motion on Tuesday that suggests potentially removing parking requirements for new developments citywide, a move aimed at easing the housing crunch as long as renters are willing to forgo off-street parking.
The council members emphasized the need to lower construction costs for new housing in their motion, highlighting that eliminating parking requirements could be one effective strategy.
However, this proposal is still in its infancy.
Any final decision on ending parking minimums will take months and will require a full City Council vote.
Currently, some areas of Los Angeles have already been allowed zero parking requirements for new projects located within half a mile of major transit stops, thanks to a 2022 state law, AB 2097.
The new motion could expand the reach of this policy throughout the entire city.
The proposal comes at a time when housing construction in Los Angeles has stagnated, falling significantly short of state-mandated goals.
Housing advocates have expressed excitement over the motion.
Azeen Khanmalek, executive director of Abundant Housing L.A., described it as one of the most substantial housing affordability motions in recent years.
He framed the decision as critical to prioritizing housing for people instead of cars.
However, the debate around this issue has already ignited strong opinions among community members.
As new apartment buildings without on-site parking emerge in some neighborhoods, concerns over street parking have increased.
Conrad Starr, president of the Greater Wilshire Neighborhood Council, pointed to long-standing worries about developers utilizing new legislation to create standardized projects that boost their profits while minimizing investment in neighborhood needs.
Residents have voiced fears that newcomers to these parking-free buildings might overwhelm the finite street parking.
This issue tends to mobilize community members, including families who might currently live in apartments without parking spaces.
For instance, parents with young children may find it especially difficult to park several blocks away from their home.
The current parking requirements in Los Angeles vary by the type of housing being constructed.
Typically, developers must provide at least one parking space for every one-bedroom unit, with additional spaces required for larger apartments.
These mandates inflate construction costs and limit how much space can be dedicated to building apartments.
A study from the Terner Center for Housing Innovation at UC Berkeley indicates that constructing a parking structure for an affordable housing project can raise costs by up to $38,000 per apartment.
Another study revealed that bundling parking with each unit can increase monthly rents for Los Angeles tenants by approximately $200.
Despite the high costs associated with parking mandates, many developers may continue to include on-site parking to attract potential renters, as most households in Los Angeles own cars.
Khanmalek pointed out that parking is still a crucial requirement for many people, implying that parking won’t vanish even if the city mandates its elimination.
On the other hand, removing parking requirements could offer developers the flexibility to cater to renters interested in living without a car, thus providing them an opportunity to reduce their rental expenses.
M. Nolan Gray, a research director for California YIMBY, emphasized that many Angelenos want the choice to live car-light or car-free.
When off-street parking is mandated, that option disappears.
Interestingly, the motion isn’t just looking to ease parking requirements for residential developments; it also extends to commercial projects.
The proposal suggests that allowing smaller businesses the option to minimize or eliminate parking could level the competitive field.
As mentioned in the motion, companies like Amazon are not held to the same parking rules as local businesses and can operate without such constraints.
In California, other cities such as San Francisco, Sacramento, and Culver City have already eliminated parking requirements for new developments, showcasing a trend toward more flexible urban planning.
As for what comes next, this proposal must first navigate the council’s planning committee before reaching a City Council vote.
A timeline for when this will occur has not yet been established.
Once approved, the motion would require the Department of City Planning and the Department of Building and Safety to compile a report analyzing the feasibility, costs, and benefits of implementing a citywide elimination of parking requirements.
Until then, Los Angeles residents and stakeholders will be watching closely as the city grapples with this complex issue.
image source from：https://laist.com/news/housing-homelessness/los-angeles-city-council-end-parking-requirements-housing-development-raman-blumenfield
