The Pennsylvania House voted along party lines to boost the minimum wage to $15 for most residents and $12 for workers in smaller, rural counties, marking a pivotal move in ongoing efforts by Democrats to increase pay above the federal minimum of $7.25.
This increase comes after Pennsylvania’s minimum wage remained stagnant since 2008, lagging behind neighboring states such as New York, Ohio, New Jersey, West Virginia, Maryland, and Delaware.
Sponsored by House Labor and Industry Committee Chair Jason Dawkins (D-Philadelphia), the latest bill reflects an attempt to bridge the gap with Republican concerns regarding the impact of such a change on businesses in areas with lower living costs.
“Since I’ve been chair, we’ve been trying to figure out a different approach to get this done,” Dawkins explained in an interview, emphasizing insights gained from previous discussions about potential challenges.
“Some of our counties were worried about moving too quickly, and some were not comfortable going over $12,” he added.
Dawkins’ previous bill had passed the House earlier in 2023 but failed to progress through the Republican-controlled Senate.
Similarly, a Democratic-led bill aimed at raising the minimum wage to $9.25 was approved by the Senate in 2019 but met a dead end in the then-GOP-controlled House.
The new legislation proposes a gradual increase in the minimum wage, reaching $15 by January 1, 2028, for most counties.
Tipped workers would benefit from an increase in the minimum wage as well, jumping from $2.83 to 60% of the standard minimum wage.
Counties with populations under 210,000, excluding Centre, Monroe, and Pike counties, would see their minimum wage rise only to $12 in the same timeframe.
Dawkins pointed out that the specific inclusion of the three smaller counties in the $15 wage category was in response to requests from Democratic representatives.
Notably, Philadelphia County would experience a quicker rise to the $15 minimum wage, set for January 1, 2026, reflecting the city’s significant population living in poverty.
Dawkins highlighted the urgency of this change due to the potential loss of federal benefits, such as Medicaid and food assistance, that could affect vulnerable populations.
“We wanted to have some type of safety net there because we know those folks might be losing benefits and other services,” he remarked.
However, despite efforts to accommodate Republican concerns, the proposal faced unanimous opposition from House Republicans during a two-hour debate.
Critics, including Minority Leader Jesse Topper (R-Bedford), argued that not all jobs should be deemed livable wages and raised concerns about potential job losses and adverse effects on small businesses.
Topper stated, “Not every wage is designed to be a livable wage. My 16-year-old son is not working for a livable wage. Someone who is retired and is helping out part-time, that is not necessarily a livable wage.”
Others expressed worries about the practicality of a county-specific wage system tailored to local economies, fearing it might lead to confusion among businesses operating across county lines.
Rep. Kate Klunk (R-York) criticized the proposal, stating, “This county-based patchwork of minimum wages is going to be a mess, creating a compliance nightmare for business owners.
Rep. Mike Jones (R-York), while recognizing the intent behind the bill as a reasonable compromise, still could not lend his support without additional provisions for nonprofit organizations and younger employees.
For the proposal to become law, it must navigate the Republican-controlled Senate.
Senate Majority Leader Joe Pittman (R-Indiana) indicated openness to some form of compromise, particularly if it is combined with deregulation initiatives aimed at promoting growth in family-supporting jobs.
“Making sure working families have access to good, family-sustaining jobs is key to helping our commonwealth grow and thrive,” Pittman stated.
Republican Senator Dan Laughlin (R-Erie), who has introduced legislation for a $15 minimum wage, expressed appreciation for the House’s efforts but rejected the county-based approach.
Laughlin remarked, “A minimum wage tied to county size just deepens the economic divides we’re supposed to be addressing.
If we’re going to get serious about raising the minimum wage, we need to do it uniformly across the state, not with a patchwork approach that leaves people behind based on where they live.”
While the conversation around minimum wage reform continues, national sentiments may resonate with Pennsylvania’s Republicans, as evidenced by a recent bill from conservative U.S. Senator Josh Hawley (R-Missouri) proposing a nationwide $15 minimum wage.
Hawley emphasized the necessity for the party to advocate for the working class, stating, “If we’re going to be a working people’s party, we have to do something for working people. And working people haven’t gotten a raise in years. So they need a raise.”
This shift in rhetoric might signal an increasingly accommodating stance within the Republican Party towards wage reform, prompted by evolving voter demographics.
Dawkins, the sponsor of the Pennsylvania bill, echoed hope for bipartisan support, expressing optimism that these discussions could lead to a successful outcome.
“I’m excited by the prospects, but I’m also disappointed that there could be a federal minimum wage that’s going to be higher than the state minimum wage — and it’s being offered by one of the most conservative members of Congress,” Dawkins joked.
He concluded, “But I’m hopeful it will help folks come around to the idea. This is what I believe we got elected to do.”
image source from：https://www.phillyvoice.com/pennsylvania-house-minimum-wage-bill-philly-15-dollars/
