President Donald Trump is grappling with mounting skepticism from Republican senators, global investors, and voters regarding his multitrillion-dollar tax breaks package, amid fears that it may exacerbate the national debt.
Financial markets have expressed doubt as Trump’s administration has yet to deliver on promises to trim deficits, putting into question the efficacy of his fiscal policies.
Michael Strain, director of economic policy studies at the American Enterprise Institute, highlighted the concerns surrounding the administration’s competence, noting that the rhetoric of spending cuts has failed to materialize, undermining confidence in adding to the deficit.
The White House has responded aggressively to critics who warn about the implications of ballooning debt under Trump, with press secretary Karoline Leavitt aiming to counter claims that the tax cuts will worsen the deficit.
Leavitt defended the tax cuts, attributing concerns about the deficit to misleading projections and assumptions from the Congressional Budget Office and other fiscal scorekeepers.
However, Trump himself has acknowledged the challenges in implementing sufficient spending cuts, citing the need to maintain the delicate Republican coalition in Congress.
In his own words, Trump stated, “We have to get a lot of votes. We can’t be cutting.”
This stance has led the administration to rely on the optimistic belief that economic growth will offset the debt increases, a notion met with skepticism from many economists beyond Trump’s inner circle.
Elon Musk, a former key ally of Trump in economic matters, voiced his disappointment regarding a massive spending bill that he feels contradicts the administration’s fiscal goals, stating, “I was disappointed to see the massive spending bill, frankly, which increases the budget deficit, not just decreases it.”
The ramifications of the proposed tax and spending cuts approved by the House could add over $5 trillion to the national debt within a decade if enacted without offsets, as per the Committee for a Responsible Financial Budget, a fiscal watchdog organization.
In an effort to present the legislation’s cost as lower, components of the bill are designed to expire, echoing past tactics from Trump’s 2017 tax cuts that face similar expiration dilemmas.
The national debt has surged significantly, exceeding $36.1 trillion, and investors are demanding higher rates to compensate for this increase. The interest for 10-year Treasury Notes has risen to around 4.5%, a stark contrast to the roughly 2.5% rate at the time of the 2017 tax cuts.
The White House Council of Economic Advisers asserts that the policies associated with these tax cuts will achieve rapid economic growth, thereby reducing annual budget deficits relative to the larger economy.
They anticipate an annual average economic expansion of approximately 3.2% over the next four years, outpacing the Congressional Budget Office’s forecast of 1.9%, and predicting the creation or preservation of up to 7.4 million jobs.
This perspective is not universally accepted, as many economists regard the Congressional Budget Office as the authoritative source for policy assessment.
Stephen Miran, the Council’s chair, insisted to reporters that the administration is committed to addressing deficit concerns while projecting a decrease in expected deficits, bolstered by tariff revenues and a growth-oriented economic outlook.
Despite the administration’s assertions, there is significant skepticism among outside economists about the feasibility of sustained growth to alleviate the deficit. The additional debt is expected to result in higher interest rates, which would slow economic growth and increase borrowing costs for homes and businesses.
Brendan Duke, formerly of the Biden administration and now at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, stated that the tax cuts set to expire in 2028 will compound future challenges for lawmakers, who will simultaneously have to tackle Social Security, Medicare, and expiring tax cuts.
Kent Smetters, with the Penn Wharton Budget Model, dismissed the growth projections from the Trump economic team as unrealistic, while Harvard University professor Jason Furman contended that the tax cuts are not primarily designed to promote growth and competitiveness.
Furman stated, “I don’t know of any serious forecaster that has meaningfully raised their growth forecast because of this legislation.”
The White House’s inability to quell deficit worries is generating political backlash, particularly as the tax and spending cuts transition from the House to the Senate.
Republican Senators Ron Johnson of Wisconsin and Rand Paul of Kentucky have articulated reservations about the potential deficit increase, signaling a willingness to halt the bill until a more serious approach to spending reduction is adopted.
Johnson emphasized, “I think we have enough to stop the process until the president gets serious about the spending reduction and reducing the deficit.”
Apart from the concerns raised by lawmakers, the Trump administration is banking on tariff revenues to help bridge the deficit gaps, despite recent court rulings questioning the legitimacy of his declared economic emergency powers to impose tariffs.
Upon announcing his widespread tariffs, Trump projected that these policies would generate sufficient revenue to begin paying down the national debt, aligning his remarks with those of aides who believed budget deficits could be significantly reduced.
Trump claimed, “It’s our turn to prosper and in so doing, use trillions and trillions of dollars to reduce our taxes and pay down our national debt, and it’ll all happen very quickly.”
While acknowledging that growth could mitigate deficit pressures, economists like Ernie Tedeschi from Yale University argue it alone is insufficient to address the underlying issues.
Tedeschi pointed out the need for a staggering $10 trillion of deficit reduction over the next decade just to stabilize the U.S. debt.
Moreover, he noted that much of the proposed growth from tax cuts would merely preserve existing tax breaks, challenging the expectation of any meaningful economic boost.
In summary, the Trump administration stands at a crossroads, balancing the push for tax cuts and the pressing need to address a rising national debt. The skepticism from within and beyond party lines complicates the path forward, as the administration attempts to unify Republican support while navigating the complex landscape of fiscal policy.
image source from：https://www.pennlive.com/nation-world/2025/06/can-trump-fix-the-national-debt-republican-senators-and-many-others-have-doubts.html
