Los Angeles has failed to meet its Vision Zero goals.
That’s the conclusion of a newly released audit, which found the city’s long-running effort to eliminate traffic deaths by this year has been impeded by a lack of cohesion across departments, insufficient political support and an imbalanced approach.
In 2015, the city adopted Vision Zero, a policy framework from Sweden with the principle that no one should be killed in traffic.
Then-Mayor Eric Garcetti set benchmarks for reducing traffic fatalities over a decade, culminating in the final goal of getting to zero traffic deaths by 2025.
The opposite has happened.
Since the program’s adoption, traffic fatalities in L.A. have increased.
In 2024, 303 people died in traffic fatalities in L.A., according to preliminary LAPD data reviewed by LAist.
“Eliminating traffic deaths is an ambitious goal but remains the correct one,” a spokesperson for the Department of Transportation said in a statement to LAist.
“LADOT will continue to pursue and promote policy changes along with the most effective engineering design principles and continue to invest in proven treatments that make our streets safer.”
What’s the audit?
Following direction from the L.A. City Council in 2022, the office of the City Administrative Officer spent $500,000 on an independent contractor to evaluate the first seven years of Vision Zero.
The office of the City Administrative Officer and Department of Transportation wrote a report accompanying the audit, which was released Friday, with recommendations for the L.A. City Council “to relaunch the Vision Zero Program with a more deliberate and collaborative approach.”
What did the audit find?
While the Department of Transportation leads the city’s Vision Zero work, nearly every related project requires the participation of other agencies, including Engineering, Street Services, the LAPD and more.
In his directive establishing the program, Garcetti envisioned a Vision Zero Steering Committee made up of representatives from departments citywide to coordinate the implementation of traffic safety projects.
By mid-2018, that committee had stopped meeting, the audit found.
The reduction in participation resulted in the loss of a “useful forum to collaborate on Vision Zero goals and nothing quite replaced this level of interaction,” the audit said.
The last time the Department of Transportation revised its action plan, the document that coordinates projects across city agencies, was in 2018.
The audit identified 56 “actions and strategies” from that plan that were meant to be completed by the end of 2020, including projects focused on street design and lighting and Vision Zero education campaigns.
Half of those projects remain incomplete as of the end of 2023, the audit found.
According to interviews the audit is based on, “the level of enthusiasm at City Hall” for Vision Zero has decreased since the program was launched.
“Some of the reasons cited include the pandemic, conflicts of personality, lack of total buy-in for implementation, disagreements over how the program should be administered and scaling issues,” the audit said.
Without political support and lack of communication from council members about the program, Vision Zero becomes less effective, the audit noted.
“As a governing body, this city does not treat traffic violence as the public health crisis that it has become,” Damian Kevitt, the executive director of Streets Are For Everyone, told LAist.
The audit also indicated that traffic enforcement in L.A. has fallen due to LAPD staffing shortages and concerns over over-policing.
“There has been a pattern observed over the years in terms of declining [driving under the influence] arrests and total citations related to safety,” the audit stated.
The audit further pointed out that the city overly focused on infrastructure and engineering, to the detriment of public education and regular monitoring of the program’s progress.
Mayor Karen Bass’ office and the LAPD did not immediately respond to LAist’s requests for comment.
What’s the status of traffic fatalities in L.A.?
In 2015, the year L.A. launched Vision Zero, around 240 people died in traffic collisions, according to state data.
The number has not fallen below 280 in any year since.
By 2024, it had increased to 303, according to an LAist review of LAPD data.
Progress on reducing traffic fatalities nationally has slowed over the last decade.
The problem became worse during the pandemic, likely due to an increase in riskier behaviors, according to UC Berkeley transportation safety researcher Matthew Raifman.
Over the last decade, traffic fatalities in L.A. grew faster than the national average.
His findings are based on data from 2023, which is the most recent year national data is available.
The city has more pedestrian and cyclist fatalities than the other four most populated U.S. cities, Raifman told LAist.
“That’s deeply problematic because [walking and biking] are an important mode of transportation and something that we’re trying to incentivize in many American cities,” Raifman said.
A safer future?
Since the audit was completed at the end of 2023, the city’s Department of Transportation identified a new network of streets that see an outsized number of collisions resulting in death or serious injury based on updated data.
The department also evaluated the effectiveness of interventions to make streets safer, which the department’s spokesperson stated will guide future projects.
The city is expected to have automated speed cameras installed on dangerous streets by the middle of next year as a result of state legislation signed in 2023.
The audit points to the success similar cameras have had in helping to reduce traffic fatalities in other cities.
The spokesperson from the Department of Transportation noted that city officials will “pursue additional changes in legislation” to ensure consistent enforcement and accountability for risky driving behavior such as running red lights, driving under the influence, distracted driving, and excessive speed.
At the end of 2024, Bass directed the city to establish L.A.’s first Capital Improvement Plan, a long-term planning document that nearly every other major U.S. city uses to prioritize and allocate funding for infrastructure projects.
The city is still very early on in developing this plan, but it could help alleviate some of the coordination and planning woes the audit uncovered.
image source from：https://boyleheightsbeat.com/vision-zero-los-angeles-city-traffic-death/
