Washington, DC – Just hours before Israel initiated its first wave of airstrikes against Iran, President Donald Trump reaffirmed the United States’ commitment to diplomacy with Tehran.
However, the Israeli attacks have jeopardized these negotiations and heightened the risk of a broader conflict in the Middle East, potentially involving the US.
Responses from both sides of the US political spectrum revealed significant divides, with calls for caution from some lawmakers while others expressed unyielding support for Israel.
In the wake of the bombing in Tehran and other Iranian cities, many American politicians rushed to offer their prayers for Israel.
Despite some dissent, support for Israel within the political establishment remains strong, even as public opinion and political sentiments show noticeable shifts.
The Trump administration quickly distanced itself from Israel’s actions.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio stressed that the US was not involved in the strikes against Iran.
“Tonight, Israel took unilateral action against Iran. We are not involved in strikes against Iran and our top priority is protecting American forces in the region,” Rubio stated.
He added that Israel had informed the US that the action was necessary for its self-defense and urged Iran not to retaliate against American interests.
President Trump echoed this sentiment during an interview with Fox News, expressing hope to return to the negotiating table with Iran.
However, the prospects for continued diplomacy seem grim, especially as early reports indicate that Tehran may not participate in the upcoming nuclear negotiations in Oman.
Within the Republican Party, many leaders voiced their unwavering support for Israel.
Lawmakers such as Katie Britt, Rick Scott, and Gary Palmer urged their followers to pray for Israel’s safety, using identical phrases in their messages.
House Speaker Mike Johnson also firmly backed Israel’s right to defend itself, emphasizing their sovereign right to act.
Senate Majority Leader John Thune’s statement, while supportive of Israel, highlighted US interests, indicating readiness to collaborate with allies to ensure American safety against Iranian aggression.
On social media, hawkish Republican Senator Lindsey Graham declared, “Game on. Pray for Israel,” signaling that many in the GOP stand firmly with the nation.
Despite some speculation that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu launched the strikes to undermine Trump’s diplomatic efforts with Tehran, the majority of Republicans staunchly supported Israel’s actions.
In contrast, several progressive Democrats openly criticized the strikes.
Senator Chris Murphy condemned the Israeli actions, asserting that they were likely intended to disrupt the Trump administration’s diplomatic initiatives.
He remarked that the potential for conflict was a consequence of choices made by both Trump and Netanyahu, exacerbating the risk of destabilizing the region.
Murphy emphasized that a war between Israel and Iran would have dire implications not just for Israel and the US, but for the broader region as well.
Furthermore, he insisted that the US has no obligation to engage in a war with Iran on Israel’s behalf.
Senator Jack Reed, senior Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee, urged for immediate restraint from both nations, suggesting that the situation could escalate dangerously.
Reed called for Trump and international partners to advocate for diplomacy to prevent further escalation.
Representative Joaquin Castro lamented the timing of the strikes, especially with diplomatic talks scheduled for the near future, calling the action sabotage by Netanyahu.
He questioned what “America First” means when the US might be pulled into a conflict that most Americans do not wish to support.
Yet, amidst the criticism, certain Democrats maintained their support for Israel.
Congressman Ritchie Torres articulated that Israel’s actions are part of its self-defense strategy, despite the complexities surrounding the conflict.
Senator John Fetterman also expressed his approval of military actions against Iranian leadership, indicating a divergence within the Democratic Party regarding support for Israel.
Several lawmakers attempted to frame the Israeli strikes as a necessary measure to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear capabilities.
Congressman George Latimer asserted that a nuclear-capable Iran poses an existential threat to regional stability and Israel’s security, reinforcing his backing for Israel’s self-defense.
As the situation continues to evolve, the ramifications of Israel’s military actions and the responses from US leaders underscore the deep political divides on foreign policy and the complexities of the US-Israel relationship.
The strain on diplomatic efforts with Iran and the potential for increased conflict remain central concerns as both domestic and international audiences monitor developments in the region.
image source from：https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/6/13/how-us-politicians-responded-to-israels-attacks-on-iran
